Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Jan 15.
Published in final edited form as: Neuroimage. 2010 Sep 25;54(2):807–823. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.09.052

Figure 8.

Figure 8

(A) Sensitivity, false positive rate (FPR) and Accuracy in identifying causal intrinsic and modulatory connections in the 2-node network (shown in Figure 3A) at SNRs of 0, 5 and 10 dB using MDS-MLE, MDS-VB and GCA. (B) Similar results for 3-node (shown in Figure 3B) and (C) 5-node (shown in Figure 3C) networks. The performance of MDS is superior to GCA for all 3 networks and SNRs. Among MDS methods, the performance of MDS-VB is superior to MDS-MLE. Sample size T = 500 time points.