Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Dec 6.
Published in final edited form as: Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2009 Feb 17;24(6):1979–1986. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfp045

Table 2.

Comparison of histomorphological criteria of allograft injury and markers of humoral rejection between T-cell predominant (CD68/CD3 ratio <1) and MO predominant (CD68/CD3 ratio >1) cases

Overall
n = 34 (100)
CD68/CD3<1
n = 16 (47)
CD68/CD3>1
n = 18 (53)
P-value
Banff ’05 criteria
g >0 17 (50) 6 (38) 11 (61) ns
i >0 30 (88) 15 (98) 15 (83) ns
t >0 30 (88) 14 (88) 16 (89) ns
v >0 34 (100) 16 (100) 18 (100) ns
ah >1 1 (3) 1 (6) 0 ns
cg >1 0 0 0
ci >1 1 (3) 0 1 (6) ns
ct >1 0 0 0
cv >1 2 (6) 1 (6) 1 (6) ns
mm 1 (3) 0 1 (6) ns
Peritubular capillaritis 30 (88) 15 (94) 15 (83) ns
Interstitial rejection (>i1 and >t1) 1 (3) 0 1 (6) ns
Other lesions
Thrombotic microangiopathy 6 (18) 1 (6) 5 (28) ns
Oedema 20 (59) 6 (38) 14 (78) ns
Acute tubular necrosis 19 (56) 8 (50) 11 (61) ns
C4d staining
C4d positivity in PTC 6 (18) 3 (19) 3 (17) ns
C4d positivity in glomeruli 13 (38) 7 (44) 6 (34) ns
C4d positivity in arteries 2 (6) 1 (6) 1 (6) ns

PRA, panel-reactive antibodies; PTC, peritubular capillaries; ns, not significant.

Data are given as counts and percentages (in brackets) or median and interquartile range (range from the 25th to the 75th percentile).