Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Dec 6.
Published in final edited form as: Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng. 2010 Mar 1;7623:762344. doi: 10.1117/12.844214

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Results for simulated surfaces: (a) The ground truth phantom parcellation, (b) simulated confusion matrix rater (true positive fraction = 0.7), (c) STAPLES result using 7 such raters without spatial correlation, (d) the results of 50 Monte Carlo iterations varying the expected rater performance and the number of raters, and (e) the STAPLES result using a MRF. Also shown are (f) a sample simulated boundary error rater (true positive fraction = 0.7), and (g) the STAPLES result using 7 such raters without spatial correlation.