Skip to main content
. 2010 Dec 6;5(12):e14234. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0014234

Table 2. Isolation model (IM) for Scots and loblolly pines.

Locus SXtaeda a SXsylv. b Sshared c Sfixed d ∑G e df P f Sig.
Obs Sim Obs Sim Obs Sim Obs Sim
4cl 11 7.18 2 1.18 0 0.32 2 6.31 6.90 4 0.23
axr 1 7.71 2 2.25 0 0.25 13 5.65 17.08 4 1.84×10-3 *
bhlh62-like 7 4.91 0 1.41 0 0.16 3 3.53 3.99 4 1.23
ccoaoemt 14 12.5 0 0 0 0 10 11.49 0.40 4 14.30
cesA3 4 3.83 0 0.63 0 0.17 4 3.36 1.75 4 5.03
cyp450-like 10 5.5 0 0 0 0 0 4.79 13.03 4 -
enth1-like 11 8.83 0 2.53 0 0.28 7 6.36 6.18 4 0.35
erd3 8 15.63 0 0 0 0 22 14.37 8.02 4 0.12
erebp-like 22 23.07 1 6.61 0 0.73 24 16.59 11.85 4 0.07
erf1-like 6 10.41 0 0 0 0 14 9.58 4.01 4 1.22
gatabp1 0 8.34 1 2.39 0 0.27 29 6 89.62 4 1.6×10−18 *
gatabp2 11 12.76 3 3.65 0 0.41 12 9.18 1.98 4 10.03
ldox-a 14 11.78 3 3.37 0 0.38 7 8.47 1.46 4 13.01
ldox-c 18 16.29 0 0 0 0 12 13.71 0.39 4 22.16
lp5 20 13.25 2 3.8 4 0.42 1 9.53 27.39 4 1.7×10−5 *
mybs3-like 5 5.21 0 0 0 0 5 4.79 0.01 4 24.71
myb3-psd 11 14.19 1 4.09 0 0.45 17 10.27 8.71 4 0.35
nac1 19 15.65 1 4.51 0 0.5 12 11.34 5.71 4 1.55
pal1 6 8.34 5 2.39 0 0.27 6 6 3.43 4 1.73
pcna 16 8.83 0 2.53 0 0.28 2 6.36 14.38 4 6.2×10−3 *
pr4.1 18 18.59 4 5.36 1 0.59 15 13.46 0.80 4 22.96
rd21a 25 21.88 0 0 0 0 17 20.12 0.94 4 9.00
sams2 6 6.87 8 1.97 0 0.22 0 4.94 20.81 4 3.5×10−4 *
set-like-b 6 12.27 8 3.51 0 0.39 11 8.83 9.43 4 0.24
set-like-c 19 18.65 18 5.34 0 0.59 1 13.42 39.26 4 6.2×10−8 *
tps-like 12 12.76 3 3.65 0 0.41 11 9.18 1.32 4 13.94
wrky-like-1 7 5.4 1 1.55 2 0.17 1 3.88 9.87 4 0.53
a

Number of polymorphisms detected in loblolly pine sequences (N = 27–32).

b

Number of polymorphisms detected in Scots pine sequences (N = 2).

c

Number of shared polymorphisms between loblolly pine and Scots pine.

d

Number of fixed differences between loblolly pine and Scots pine.

e

Sum of the chi-squared values for each class of variation per locus.

f

Significance of the chi-squared values.

*Indicates P<0.05 for the significance of the results, after Bonferroni correction for multiple testing. Bonferroni corrected threshold for α = 0.05 is 1.85×10−3.

The results from comparing observed values to 10,000 simulations under the fit model (see text) are also presented. P-values reported in the table below can be multiplied by the number of loci analyzed (27) to provide a Bonferroni correction for multiple tests. Loci that deviated from the fit model are shown in bold.