Skip to main content
. 2010 Dec;186(4):1321–1336. doi: 10.1534/genetics.110.121202

TABLE 1.

Phenotypic analysis of a sister-of-Sex-lethal null mutant allele

Crossa Genotype % relative viability (no.) % relative fecundityb (no. vs. control) Control sibs for viability and fecundity determination
A ssx/ssx 89 (940) 102 (7 vs. 10) +/ssx
A ssx/Y ♂ 92 (913) 76 (12 vs. 10) +/Y ♂
B ssx+Rev/ssx 97 (1075) ND +/ssx
B ssx+Rev/Y ♂ 96 (1031) 90 (12 vs. 12) +/Y ♂c
C ssxSxl/ssx Sxl+ 75 (376) 96 (9 vs. 12) ssxSxl/ssx +; Dp(Sxl+)/+
C ssxSxl/ssx Sxl+; Dp(Sxl+)/+ 102 (504) ND Balancer/ssx
C ssx Sxl/Y ♂ 90 (462) 139 (15 vs. 14) ssxSxl/Y; Dp(Sxl+)/+ ♂
D ssx Sxl/ssx+Rev + 85 (377) 76 (11 vs. 11) ssxSxl/ssx+Rev +; Dp(Sxl+)/+
a

Full genotypes of crosses: (A) y ssx−55 w/+ ♀♀ × ♂♂ y ssx−55 w/Y; (B) y ssx+Rev26 w/+ ♀♀ × ♂♂ y ssx−55 w/Y; (C) Binsinscy/y ssx−55 w cm Sxlf1 ct; P[Sxl+w+mC]2A/+♀♀ × ♂♂ y ssx55 w/Y; (D) same mothers as C × ♂♂ y ssx−+Rev26 w/Y.

b

Ratio of the median progeny recovered per parent to that for the control sibs.

c

In this one case, the controls for fecundity determination were cousins from cross A rather than sibs.