Skip to main content
. 2010 Nov 11;11:553. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-11-553

Table 2.

comparison between RMA and tRMA in the affycomp benchmark

MAS5 RMA tRMA Best possible
Signal detect slope 0.71 0.63 0.63 1

Signal detect R2 0.86 0.80 0.80 1

Obs-intended-fc slope 0.69 0.61 0.61 1

Obs-(low)int-fc slope 0.65 0.36 0.36 1

null log-fc IQR 0.85 0.19 0.20 0

null log-fc 99.9% 4.48 0.57 0.58 0

low AUC 0.07 0.40 0.39 1

med AUC 0.00 0.87 0.86 1

high AUC 0.00 0.46 0.44 1

weighted avg AUC 0.05 0.52 0.51 1

Median SD 0.63 0.11 0.12 0

low.slope 0.72 0.35 0.35 1

med.slope 0.80 0.76 0.76 1

high.slope 0.45 0.47 0.47 1

affycompII most indicative results (as in [6]) for MAS5, RMA and tRMA, spike-in HGU95 dataset. Differences between RMA and tRMA are trivial, especially when compared to other methods (see also [6]).