Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Exp Gerontol. 2010 Sep 29;46(1):23–29. doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2010.09.011

Table 2.

Estimated correlations for measured variables with age and for differences in trends for variables between Control and CR monkeys.

Diet 6y 9y 12y Est Corrd p value Fe p value
Age C 16.2 ± 0.5 19.2 ± 0.5 22.3 ± 0.5
R 15.8 ± 0.5 18.8 ± 0.5 21.8± 0.5
%Mma C 99.0 ± 87.1 78.8 r = −0.70 <0.01 16.41 < 0.01
R 90.8 ± 91.6 92.1 r = −0.15 0.48
% Type II C 96.7 ± 1.35 92.3 ± 1.5 90.7 ± 1.9 r = 0.44 0.03 3.88 0.03
R 95.4 ± 1.03 96.1 ± 1.6 92.7 ± 2.0 r = −0.16 0.46
CSAb Type I C 5044 ± 598 4694 ± 448 6271 ± 762 r = −0.06 0.67 0.32 0.73
R 4450 ± 543 4650 ± 329 6322 ± 631 r = 0.23 0.11
CSA Type II C 12073 ± 299 10152 ± 370 8579 ± 359 r = −0.62 0.00 11.15 < 0.01
R 9051 ± 1021 9733 ± 602 10983 ± 732 r = 0.23 0.16
ETSAbc C 0.14 ± 0.05 0.31 ± 0.06 1.05 ± 0.19 r = 0.44 0.03 1.07 0.35
R 0.17 ± 0.06 0.82 ± 0.51 0.64 ± 0.36 r = 0.22 0.30
a

% Muscle Mass (upper leg muscle mass / maximum upper leg muscle mass) × 100

b

Cross-sectional area (μm2)

c

Electron transport system enzyme abnormalities

d

Correlation with age

e

Difference between trends in Control and Restricted