Skip to main content
. 2010 Mar 16;2(3):97–103. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v2.i3.97

Table 2.

Success and pancreatitis rates with cannulation techniques

% Ref.
Primary success in cannulation
Standard catheter 54 to 67 [3,30]
Standard catheter with guide wire 81 [3]
Sphincterotome 78 to 84 [4,29]
Sphincterotome with guide wire 97 to 99 [26,30]
Success in difficult cannulation after primary failure with standard method
Persistence 73 to 75 [2,49]
Needle knife 67 to 91 [2,6,9,34,37]
Erlangen knife 78 to 100 [32,50]
Pancreatic sphincterotomy 91 to 100 [10,12,13,22,40,41]
Pancreatic stent 97 to 100 [28,47]
Pancreatic guide wire 73 to 93 [5,8]
Pancreatitis rate after difficult cannulation
Persistence 2-4 [2,49]
Needle knife 1-11 [2,6,9,34,37]
Erlangen knife 3-7 [32,50]
Pancreatic sphincterotomy 0-12 [10,12,13,22,40,41]
Pancreatic stent 5-7 [28,47]
Pancreatic guide wire 0-2 [5,8]

Randomized controlled trials were used in literature 2, 3, 5, 10, 26, 28, 29, 30 and 49.