Table 1.
Ref. | Molecule | Phase | Patients | RR | DS | PFS (mo) | TTP (mo) | OS (mo) |
Abou-Alfa et al[69] | Sorafenib | II | 137 | 2.2 | 33.6 | nr | 4.2 | 9.2 |
Llovet et al[70,71] | Sorafenib | III | 602 | 2 | 71 | nr | 5.5 | 10.7 |
Cheng et al[72] | Sorafenib | III | 226 | 3.3 | 54 | nr | 2.8 | 6.5 |
Richly et al[73] | sorafenib/doxorubicin | I | 18 | 6 | 63 | nr | nr | nr |
Abou-Alfa et al[74] | sorafenib/doxorubicin | II | 96 | 4 | 77 | 6.9 | 8.6 | 13.7 |
Siegel et al[86] | bevacizumab | II | 46 | 13 | nr | 6.9 | nr | 12.4 |
Malka et al[87] | bevacizumab | II | 30 | 12.5 | 54 | nr | nr | nr |
Zhu et al[88] | bevacizumab/GEMOX | II | 33 | 20 | 27 | 5.3 | nr | 9.6 |
Sun et al[89] | bevacizumab/CAPOX | II | 30 | 11 | 78 | 5.4 | nr | nr |
Hsu et al[90] | bevacizumab/capecitabine | II | 45 | 9 | 42 | 4.1 | nr | 10.7 |
Thomas et al[92] | erlotinib | II | 40 | 0 | 43 | 3.1 | nr | 6.25 |
Philip et al[93] | erlotinib | II | 38 | 9 | 50 | 3.2 | nr | 13 |
Thomas et al[91] | bevacizumab/erlotinib | II | 40 | 25 | 42.5 | 9.0 | nr | 15.6 |
O’Dwyer et al[94] | gefitinib | II | 31 | 3 | 22.5 | 2.8 | nr | 6.5 |
Ramanathan et al[95] | lapatinib | II | 30 | 5 | 35 | 2.3 | nr | 6.2 |
Zhu et al[101] | cetuximab | II | 30 | 0 | 17 | 1.4 | nr | 9.6 |
Grünwald et al[102] | cetuximab | II | 32 | 0 | 44 | nr | 1.9 | nr |
Asnacios et al[103] | cetuximab/GEMOX | II | 45 | 20 | 40 | 4.7 | nr | 9.5 |
Faivre et al[81] | sunitinib | II | 37 | 2.7 | 35 | nr | 5.3 | 9.3 |
Zhu et al[82] | sunitinib | II | 34 | 2.9 | 47 | 4.0 | nr | 9.9 |
Hoda et al[83] | sunitinib | II | 23 | 6 | 35 | nr | nr | nr |
RR: Response rate (complete + partial response), SD: Stable disease; PFS: Progression-free survival; TTP: Time to progression; OS: Overall survival; nr: Not reported; GEMOX: Gemcitabine + oxaliplatin; CAPOX: Capecitabine + oxaliplatin.