Skip to main content
. 2010 Jul 30;16(1):52–60. doi: 10.1007/s12199-010-0165-y

Table 5.

Comparison of fasting and nonfasting subjects in terms of sensitivity and specificity of waist circumference (WC) for detecting each of hypertension, low HDL-cholesterol, and hyperglycemia

Sensitivity of WCa Specificity of WCa
Fastingb Nonfastingc Pd Fastingb Nonfastingc Pd
Men
 Hypertensione 0.48 (96/200f) 0.46 (916/1993f) 0.58 0.72 (93/130g) 0.71 (995/1393g) 0.98
 Low HDL-cholesterolh 0.54 (19/34) 0.58 (265/454) 0.78 0.62 (182/296) 0.64 (1882/2932) 0.32
 Hyperglycemiai 0.51 (27/52) 0.51 (289/572) 0.65 0.62 (172/278) 0.63 (1788/2814) 0.54
Women
 Hypertensione 0.61 (139/228) 0.56 (1126/2014) 0.14 0.69 (198/286) 0.68 (2087/3077) 0.62
 Low HDL-cholesterolh 0.73 (8/11) 0.63 (86/137) 0.51 0.56 (284/503) 0.59 (2922/4954) 0.27
 Hyperglycemiai 0.63 (48/76) 0.60 (424/708) 0.58 0.59 (259/438) 0.61 (2689/4383) 0.36

aWC cutoff was set at 88 cm for men and 82 cm for women

bThe fasting subjects correspond to those shown in Table 1

cSubjects receiving medication for any of hypertension, hyperglycemia, and dyslipidemia were excluded

dBased on the χ2 test

eDefined as systolic blood pressure ≥ 130 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure ≥ 85 mmHg

fNo. of those with WC at and above the cutoff/no. of those with risk factor

gNo. of those with WC below the cutoff/no. of those without risk factor

hDefined as HDL-cholesterol < 40 mg/dL

iDefined as hemoglobin A1c ≥ 5.5%