Skip to main content
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism logoLink to The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism
. 2010 Sep 15;95(12):5427–5434. doi: 10.1210/jc.2010-1662

Inflammatory Mediators and Glucose in Pregnancy: Results from a Subset of the Hyperglycemia and Adverse Pregnancy Outcome (HAPO) Study

Lynn P Lowe 1, Boyd E Metzger 1, William L Lowe Jr 1, Alan R Dyer 1, Thomas W McDade 1, H David McIntyre 1; for the HAPO Study Cooperative Research Group1
PMCID: PMC2999969  PMID: 20843942

Abstract

Context: Inflammatory mediators are associated with type 2 and gestational diabetes. It is unknown whether there are associations with glucose in pregnant women with lesser degrees of hyperglycemia.

Objective: The objective of the study was to examine associations of inflammatory mediators with maternal glucose levels and neonatal size in a subset of participants in the Hyperglycemia and Adverse Pregnancy Outcome (HAPO) Study.

Design: Eligible pregnant women underwent a 75-g oral glucose tolerance test between 24 and 32 wk gestation, and levels of C-peptide, adiponectin, plasminogen activator inhibitor type 1 (PAI-1), C-reactive protein (CRP), and resistin were measured in fasting serum samples. Associations of inflammatory mediators with maternal glucose and with birth size were assessed using multiple linear regression analyses, adjusting for maternal body mass index (BMI), fasting C-peptide, and other potential confounders.

Results: Mean levels of adiponectin declined, and PAI-1 and CRP increased across increasing levels of maternal glucose, BMI, and C-peptide. For example, for fasting plasma glucose less than 75 mg/dl and fasting plasma glucose of 90 mg/dl or greater, adiponectin was 22.5 and 17.4 μg/ml and PAI-1 was 30.9 and 34.2 ng/ml, respectively. Associations with 1- and 2-h plasma glucose remained significant for adiponectin (P < 0.001), PAI-1 (P < 0.05), and CRP (P < 0.01) after adjustment for BMI and C-peptide. Adiponectin and CRP were inversely associated with birth weight, sum of skinfolds and percent body fat, and PAI-1 with sum of skinfolds (all P < 0.05) after adjustment for confounders. Resistin was not associated with 1- or 2-h glucose or birth size.

Conclusion: Levels of inflammatory mediators are associated with levels of maternal glucose in pregnant women without overt diabetes.


Levels of inflammatory mediators are associated with levels of maternal glucose in pregnant women without overt diabetes.


The observation that adipose tissue produces pro- and antiinflammatory mediators (adipocytokines) suggests a potential role for chronic inflammation in the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and a possible mechanism linking obesity and insulin resistance (1). Pregnancy is characterized by insulin resistance, which leads to abnormal glucose tolerance in some women. Recent evidence suggests that inflammation also contributes to pregnancy-induced insulin resistance and the development of glucose intolerance (2).

Compared with normal pregnancy, gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is characterized by increased insulin resistance. Consistent with this observation, inflammatory mediators are associated with risk of developing GDM independent of obesity (3,4,5,6). For example, two studies have shown that the level of adiponectin, an antiinflammatory adipokine, is significantly lower in women with GDM compared with controls, after adjustment for body mass index (BMI) (4,6). Nondiabetic women with prior GDM have significantly higher levels of the inflammatory mediators C-reactive protein (CRP) and plasminogen activator inhibitor type 1 (PAI-1) and significantly lower levels of adiponectin, independent of BMI (7).

To date, most studies have compared the risk of GDM between women with the highest and lowest levels of an inflammatory mediator (5,8), whereas studies of the relationship between glucose levels and/or insulin resistance and plasma inflammatory mediator levels during pregnancy in women without GDM have typically been small and inconclusive. The goal of the present analysis was to determine associations of selected inflammatory mediators with glucose tolerance during pregnancy (below the level diagnostic of diabetes mellitus) and to determine whether associations are independent of maternal BMI and hyperinsulinemia, as measured by fasting C-peptide. Because the relationship of maternal circulating levels of inflammatory mediators with size at birth, independent of their effect on glucose and insulin levels, has not been examined, a secondary goal of this study was to determine associations of inflammatory mediators with size and adiposity in the offspring. To accomplish these goals, we studied a subset of women who participated in the Hyperglycemia and Adverse Pregnancy Outcome (HAPO) Study. HAPO sought to clarify the risk of adverse outcome associated with degrees of glucose intolerance during pregnancy less severe than overt diabetes mellitus (9,10).

Materials and Methods

The HAPO Study was conducted at field centers located in North America, Europe, the Middle East, Asia, and Australia. The protocol was approved by the institutional review board at all 15 field centers. All participants gave written informed consent. An external Data Monitoring Committee provided oversight. Study methods have been published (9,10,11). A brief overview is presented here.

Participants

All pregnant women at each field center were eligible to participate unless they had one or more exclusion criteria (10): age less than 18 yr, plan to deliver at another hospital, date of last menstrual period not certain and no ultrasound estimation from 6 to 24 wk of gestational age available, inability to complete the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) by 32 wk gestation, multiple pregnancy, conception using gonadotropin ovulation induction or by in vitro fertilization, glucose testing before recruitment or a diagnosis of diabetes during this pregnancy, diabetes antedating pregnancy requiring treatment with medication, participation in another study that might have interfered with HAPO, known conditions of HIV positivity or hepatitis B or C, prior participation in HAPO, or inability to converse in the languages used in field center forms without the aid of an interpreter. If glucose measurements were made outside HAPO after initial enrollment, the participant was excluded from further participation.

Gestational age and expected date of delivery (EDD) were determined from the date of the last menstrual period if the participant was certain of her dates. If uncertain, the EDD was determined from an ultrasound (US) performed between 6 and 24 wk gestation. Final EDD was also determined from US if: 1) gestational dating from LMP differed from US dating by more than 5 d when the US was performed between 6 and 13 weeks or 2) if dating differed by more than 10 d when the US was done between 14 and 24 wk.

For the purposes of this analysis, a subset of women of predominantly northwestern European origin (from Toronto, Canada; Belfast, United Kingdom; and Brisbane and Newcastle, Australia) and their neonates with complete data were studied. All of the neonates were born at term (37–43 wk).

Oral glucose tolerance test

Participants underwent a standard 75-g OGTT between 24 and 32 wk gestation (as close to 28 wk as possible). Plasma glucose samples were collected at fasting and 1 and 2 h after the glucose load.

Height, weight, and blood pressure were measured at the OGTT visit using standardized procedures and calibrated equipment. Data concerning smoking and alcohol use, first-degree family history of diabetes, and demographic data were collected using standardized questionnaires. Race/ethnicity was self-identified by participants.

A sample for random plasma glucose (RPG) was collected at 34–37 wk gestation as a safety measure to identify cases with hyperglycemia above a predefined threshold.

Glucose analysis and unblinding

Aliquots of fasting and 2-h OGTT and RPG samples were analyzed at field center laboratories, and values were unblinded if the fasting plasma glucose (FPG) exceeded 105 mg/dl, 2-h OGTT plasma glucose (PG) exceeded 200 mg/dl, RPG was 160 mg/dl or greater, or any PG value was less than 45 mg/dl. Otherwise, participants, caregivers, and HAPO Study staff (except for laboratory personnel) remained blinded to glucose values. To avoid the confounding effects of center-to-center analytical variation, aliquots of all OGTT specimens were analyzed at the HAPO Central Laboratory and these results are used here. A Vitros 750 analyzer (Ortho-Clinical Diagnostics, Rochester, NY) was used for glucose analysis (11). The technical error for the glucose measurement was 2.0%.

Maternal BMI

Maternal height and weight, used to calculate BMI, were obtained at the OGTT visit. Height was measured twice to the nearest 0.5 cm with a stadiometer or wall-mounted measuring tape with shoes removed and the participant’s head facing forward in the horizontal plane. If the results differed by more than 1.0 cm, measurements were repeated. Weight was measured twice to the nearest 0.1 kg on a calibrated scale with outer garments and shoes removed and repeated if the results differed by more than 0.5 kg.

Fasting C-peptide

A serum sample for fasting C-peptide was collected at the OGTT visit. Because hemolysis increases insulin degradation but does not affect C-peptide level (12) and because C-peptide and insulin are secreted in equimolar amounts, C-peptide rather than insulin was measured. C-peptide measurements were performed on an Autodelfia instrument (PerkinElmer, Boston, MA). The functional sensitivity of the assay was 0.02 ng/ml with intra- and interassay coefficients of variation of 3.2–5.0 and 1.9–3.0%, respectively, in samples with high and low C-peptide concentrations (11).

Inflammatory mediator assays

Adiponectin, PAI-1, and resistin were measured in a stored fasting serum sample obtained at the OGTT. The samples were stored at −80 C until assayed. They were measured simultaneously using a particle-based flow cytometric immunoassay (Millipore Corp., St. Louis, MO) designed for the Luminex xMAP platform (Luminex Corp., Austin, TX). Analyte concentrations were calculated from best-fit standard curves generated from calibrators for each analyte, included with each assay, according to the manufacturer’s instructions. For adiponectin, the interassay coefficient of variation (CV; sd/mean) for low and high controls included with each assay was 11.3 and 15.1%, respectively. Interassay CVs for low and high PAI-1 controls were 15.0 and 7.7%, respectively. The average interplate CV for resistin was 5.7%. The high-sensitivity CRP assay was performed on an aliquot of the same serum sample at the HAPO Central Laboratory in Belfast, UK. CRP was measured with a particle-enhanced turbidimetric immunoassay (Quantex CRP-US kit; Biokit, Barcelona, Spain) on the ILab 600 (Instrumentation Laboratories Ltd., Lexington, MA), an automated clinical chemistry analyzer.

Prenatal care and delivery

Prenatal care and timing of delivery were determined by standard field center practice. No field center arbitrarily delivered patients before full term or routinely performed cesarean delivery at a specified maternal or gestational age.

Neonatal anthropometrics

Neonatal anthropometrics were obtained within 72 h of delivery. To ensure accuracy and reliability of anthropometric data and consistency across field centers, a rigorous training and certification procedure was established for study research nurses and midwives. Personnel were trained during regional training sessions run by Clinical and Data Coordinating Center staff. A training videotape providing instruction in anthropometric measurements was viewed. Research personnel observed measurements and then performed measurements on five infants. After training and before recruitment, research personnel continued to perform measurements locally on two infants per week and demonstrated their proficiency with measuring neonatal anthropometrics during a dry-run site visit. To maintain quality control of skinfold measures, all research personnel underwent annual recertification that included reviewing the videotape and providing data in tandem with another certified individual on three to five babies.

Anthropometric measurements included weight, length, and skinfold thickness at three sites (flank, subscapular, triceps). Two measurements were made and if results differed by more than a prespecified amount (>10 g for weight, 0.5 cm for length, or 0.5 mm for skinfolds, respectively), a third was done. For these analyses, the average of the two measurements was used unless a third measurement was taken. In that case, if two of three measurements differed by less than the prespecified amount, the average of those two was used; otherwise, the average of all three was used.

Birth weight was obtained without diaper using a calibrated electronic scale. Length was measured on a standardized plastic length board constructed for use in the HAPO Study. Skinfold thickness was measured with Harpenden skinfold calipers (Baty, UK). Flank skinfold was measured on the left side just above the iliac crest on a diagonal fold on the mid axillary line, triceps by taking the vertical fold over the triceps muscle half the distance between the acromion process and olecranon, and subscapular just below the lower angle of the scapula at about a 45° angle to the spine. Mean CVs for anthropometric measurements were 0.04% for birth weight, 0.17% for length, 2.91% for flank skinfold, 2.57% for subscapular skinfold, and 2.73% for triceps skinfold. Fat mass at birth (grams) was derived using the following formula (13):

graphic file with name M1.gif

where BW is birth weight in grams, FLS is the flank skinfold thickness in millimeters, and BL is birth length in centimeters. From this, percent body fat was derived as 100 × fat mass/birth weight.

Statistical analyses

Descriptive statistics include means and sds for continuous variables and numbers and percentages for categorical variables. Mean levels of inflammatory mediators were examined in categories of fasting and 1-, and 2-h PG, as well as for categories of BMI and fasting C-peptide. The categories selected are those that have been reported in previous publications (10,14), except that due to small numbers in higher categories, the top three categories were combined. Linear regression analysis was used to examine associations of inflammatory mediators with maternal fasting, 1- and 2-h PG, and neonatal birth weight; sum of skinfolds; and percent body fat. For maternal glucose, three models were run. Model I was unadjusted, model II was adjusted for maternal BMI, and model III was adjusted for maternal BMI and fasting C-peptide. For newborn size, two models were run. Model I was unadjusted and model II was adjusted for neonatal gender, gestational age at delivery, maternal BMI, fasting plasma glucose, and fasting C-peptide. Due to skewed distributions of the inflammatory mediators, log transformations of these variables were used in the linear regression analyses. All analyses were conducted in SAS (version 9.1; SAS Institute, Cary, NC).

Results

Characteristics of the 1481 blinded participants in this ancillary study are shown in Table 1 including mean and sd values for fasting serum adiponectin, PAI-1, CRP, and resistin.

Table 1.

Characteristics of HAPO inflammatory mediator study participants

n Mean sd
Maternal characteristics
 Age (yr) 1481 31.3 5.2
 BMI 1481 28.4 4.8
 Mean arterial pressure (mm Hg)a 1481 83.7 7.7
 FPG (mg/dl)a 1481 82.0 6.6
 1-h PG (mg/dl)a 1481 131.5 29.1
 2-h PG (mg/dl)a 1481 109.0 21.4
 Fasting serum C-peptide (μg/ml)a 1474 2.0 0.8
 Fasting serum adiponectin (μg/ml)a 1477 20.4 12.5
 Fasting serum PAI-1 (ng/ml)a 1476 32.6 12.1
 Fasting serum CRP (mg/liter)a 1475 5.0 5.8
 Fasting serum resistin (ng/ml)a 1473 26.6 16.2
 Gestational age (wk)a 1481 28.5 1.4
Newborn characteristics
 Gestational age (wk) 1481 39.99 1.2
 Birth weight (g) 1481 3561.8 514.4
 Length (cm) 1481 50.6 2.3
 Flank skinfold (mm) 1481 4.3 1.0
 Triceps skinfold (mm) 1481 4.1 0.9
 Subscapular skinfold (mm) 1481 4.6 1.0
 Sum of skinfolds (mm) 1481 13.0 2.7
 Body fat (%) 1481 11.9 3.6
Gender, male 748
a

Measured at the OGTT. 

In unadjusted analyses, the mean level of adiponectin declined with increasing glucose (Table 2), for example, from 22.5 μg/ml for FPG less than 75 mg/dl (4.2 mmol/liter) to 17.4 μg/ml for FPG 90 mg/dl or greater (5.0 mmol/liter). Mean PAI-1 and CRP increased across increasing levels of fasting and 1-, and 2-h PG. Mean PAI-1 ranged from 30.9 to 34.2 ng/ml across the lowest to the highest category of FPG. Similar ranges were found for 1- and 2-h PG. Mean CRP ranged from 4.4 to 6.8 mg/liter across the lowest to the highest category of FPG and similar increases were found for 1- and 2-hour PG. Mean resistin did not vary across glucose categories.

Table 2.

Mean (sd) inflammatory mediator level and categories of maternal glucose

Fasting glucose
1-h glucose
2-h glucose
Glucose (mg/dl) Mean (sd) Glucose (mg/dl) Mean (sd) Glucose (mg/dl) Mean (sd)
Adiponectin (μg/ml)
 <75 22.5 (9.9) ≤105 22.1 (9.2) ≤90 22.4 (9.7)
 75–79 20.8 (9.3) 106–132 21.1 (11.1) 91–108 21.2 (14.4)
 80–84 20.4 (10.8) 133–155 19.7 (14.2) 109–125 20.1 (14.4)
 85–89 20.4 (22.2) 156–171 17.9 (8.4) 126–139 18.1 (8.6)
 ≥90 17.4 (8.5) ≥194 18.9 (20.2) ≥140 16.9 (8.2)
P trend < 0.001 P trend < 0.001 P trend < 0.001
PAI-1 (ng/ml)
 <75 30.9 (10.7) ≤105 31.2 (11.9) ≤90 30.6 (10.4)
 75–79 32.0 (11.5) 106–132 31.7 (10.8) 91–108 32.0 (12.1)
 80–84 32.6 (12.0) 133–155 33.6 (12.8) 109–125 33.1 (11.7)
 85–89 33.8 (12.0) 156–171 34.4 (13.8) 126–139 33.9 (13.0)
 ≥90 34.2 (12.3) ≥194 34.1 (12.2) ≥140 36.3 (13.8)
P trend < 0.001 P trend < 0.001 P trend < 0.001
CRP (mg/liter)
 < 75 4.4 (6.2) ≤105 3.8 (4.5) ≤90 4.0 (5.3)
 75–79 4.5 (5.2) 106–132 4.8 (5.6) 91–108 4.5 (4.6)
 80–84 4.4 (4.5) 133–155 5.4 (6.4) 109–125 5.5 (6.4)
 85–89 5.6 (5.3) 156–171 5.8 (6.5) 126–139 5.6 (6.6)
 ≥90 6.8 (8.4) ≥194 5.6 (5.7) ≥140 6.2 (7.4)
P trend < 0.001 P trend < 0.001 P trend < 0.001
Resistin (ng/ml)
 < 75 25.7 (14.6) ≤105 26.2 (16.5) ≤90 26.3 (14.9)
 75–79 26.4 (15.1) 106–132 27.2 (15.2) 91–108 27.0 (15.3)
 80–84 27.4 (17.2) 133–155 26.0 (16.9) 109–125 26.6 (16.9)
 85–89 26.8 (15.5) 156–171 26.5 (16.4) 126–139 27.3 (19.6)
 ≥90 26.0 (18.0) ≥194 26.8 (16.5) ≥140 24.5 (14.2)
P trend = NS P trend = NS P trend = NS

NS, Not significant. 

The mean level of adiponectin decreased with increasing level of maternal BMI from 23.5 in the lowest BMI category (≤23.2 kg/m2) to 16.4 μg/ml in the highest category (≥33.7 kg/m2) as shown in Table 3. Similar results were found across increasing levels of fasting C-peptide. Mean levels of PAI-1 and CRP increased with increasing levels of BMI and fasting C-peptide. The mean level of resistin was highest in the highest category of BMI and C-peptide.

Table 3.

Mean inflammatory mediator level and categories of maternal BMI and fasting C-peptide

n % Adiponectin mean (sd) (μg/ml) PAI-1 mean (sd) (ng/ml) CRP mean (sd) (mg/liter) Resistin mean (sd) (ng/ml)
BMI (kg/m2)
 ≤23.2 149 10.0 23.5 (9.9) 32.2 (10.9) 2.9 (3.5) 25.4 (14.5)
 23.3–26.7 469 31.3 22.2 (13.4) 30.9 (11.0) 3.6 (4.2) 26.1 (15.7)
 26.8–30.5 466 31.1 19.7 (12.9) 32.5 (11.9) 4.6 (5.2) 27.1 (14.9)
 30.6–33.6 214 14.3 19.0 (13.3) 34.2 (13.6) 5.8 (4.5) 25.4 (15.7)
 ≥33.7 200 13.4 16.4 (7.9) 35.6 (13.2) 9.9 (9.5) 29.1 (21.2)
P trend < 0.001 P trend < 0.001 P trend < 0.001 P trend < 0.05
Fasting C-peptide (μg/ml)
 ≤1.2 235 15.7 25.2 (10.8) 31.4 (11.3) 4.0 (5.2) 25.7 (15.0)
 1.3–1.7 466 31.1 22.5 (14.7) 31.3 (11.4) 4.1 (4.4) 25.5 (14.8)
 1.8–2.3 418 27.9 19.5 (12.8) 32.7 (11.1) 4.8 (5.8) 27.4 (17.7)
 2.4–2.8 177 11.8 16.6 (7.9) 33.9 (14.2) 5.9 (6.4) 25.9 (13.6)
 ≥2.9 202 13.5 14.8 (7.1) 35.8 (13.6) 7.7 (7.7) 29.0 (19.0)
P trend < 0.001 P trend < 0.001 P trend < 0.001 P trend < 0.05

n, Number in the category; %, proportion in the category. 

Table 4 shows the coefficient and se for the associations of each of the inflammatory mediators with fasting and 1- and 2-h PG unadjusted and then with adjustment for maternal BMI alone and with adjustment for both BMI and C-peptide. In each of the models for adiponectin, PAI-1, and CRP, there was attenuation with adjustment for BMI and additional attenuation with adjustment for C-peptide. For adiponectin higher by 10%, mean 1- and 2-h PG were lower by 0.70 and 0.62 mg/dl, respectively. And, for PAI-1 higher by 10%, mean 1- and 2-h PGs were higher by 0.37 and 0.35 mg/dl, respectively. Similar results were found for CRP. For resistin, the only statistically significant association was in the fully adjusted model for FPG.

Table 4.

Multiple linear regression analysis of Ln-adjusted inflammatory mediators and maternal glucose: unadjusted, adjusted for BMI, and adjusted for maternal BMI and fasting C-peptide

Model Fasting glucose coefficient (se) 1-h glucose coefficient (se) 2-h glucose coefficient (se)
Adiponectin (μg/ml)
 I −2.95 (0.30)a −12.73 (1.73)a −9.98 (1.26)a
 II −1.73 (0.39)a −9.81 (1.77)a −8.09 (1.30)a
 III −0.09 (0.37) −7.02 (1.84)a −6.19 (1.35)a
PAI-1 (ng/ml)
 I 1.42 (0.44)a 5.86 (1.94)a 5.05 (1.42)a
 II 0.89 (0.42)b 4.46 (1.91)a 4.10 (1.40)c
 III 0.39 (0.38) 3.66 (1.89)b 3.52 (1.39)b
CRP (mg/liter)
 I 1.73 (0.27)a 7.18 (1.18)a 5.09 (0.86)a
 II 0.17 (0.29) 3.67 (1.31)c 2.80 (0.96)c
 III 0.00 (0.26) 3.33 (1.30)c 2.59 (0.96)c
Resistin (ng/ml)
 I −0.35 (0.27) −0.50 (1.17) −0.91 (0.86)
 II −0.45 (0.25) −0.78 (1.15) −1.10 (0.84)
 III −0.51 (0.23)b −0.83 (1.13) −1.16 (0.83)

Model I, Unadjusted; model II, adjusted for maternal BMI; model III, adjusted for maternal BMI and fasting C-peptide. 

a

P ≤ 0.001. 

b

P < 0.05. 

c

P ≤ 0.01. 

Associations between inflammatory mediators and birth weight, sum of skinfolds, and percent body fat unadjusted, and with adjustment for gestational age at delivery, maternal BMI, fasting PG, and fasting C-peptide are shown in Table 5. Adiponectin had a significant inverse association with each of the newborn measures in the unadjusted model, and this was somewhat attenuated after adjustment for confounders, but the association remained significant. A 10% higher adiponectin was associated with birth weight lower by 7.4 g. PAI-1 had a significant inverse association with sum of skinfolds in the adjusted model, whereas CRP had a significant inverse association with all three measures of newborn size but only after adjustment for confounders. Resistin was not significantly associated with birth weight or neonatal adiposity.

Table 5.

Associations between Ln-adjusted inflammatory mediators and birth weight and adiposity

Measure
Model
Adiponectin (μg/ml)
PAI-1 (ng/ml)
CRP (mg/liter)
Resistin (ng/ml)
Coefficient P value Coefficient P value Coefficient P value Coefficient P value
Birth weight I −144.47 <0.001 −5.23 0.878 22.14 0.293 −5.22 0.801
II −74.29 0.013 −43.37 0.158 −66.65 0.002 7.87 0.670
Sum of skinfolds I −0.76 <0.001 −0.25 0.156 0.11 0.302 0.13 0.226
II −0.33 0.045 −0.42 0.013 −0.26 0.024 0.14 0.169
Percent body fat I −1.04 <0.001 0.01 0.964 0.11 0.464 −0.05 0.729
II −0.50 0.027 −0.26 0.272 −0.51 0.002 −0.01 0.934

Model I, Unadjusted; model II, adjusted for neonatal gender, gestational age at delivery, maternal BMI, fasting plasma glucose, and fasting C-peptide. 

A total of 213 of the pregnant women included in this study (15%) met the newly recommended criteria for GDM (15). When they were removed from the analyses, the pattern of findings, in general, remained the same (data not shown).

Discussion

Pregnancy is characterized by insulin resistance, which appears to be due, in part, to circulating levels of inflammatory mediators (2). The placenta produces a variety of inflammatory mediators, including PAI-1, resistin and possibly adiponectin (16,17). Although CRP is produced largely by the liver, the degree to which other circulating inflammatory mediators in pregnant women originate from the placenta compared with other tissues is unclear (16). Interestingly, women with GDM have increased levels of circulating inflammatory mediators, and placental overexpression of genes encoding inflammatory mediators in a diabetic environment has been demonstrated (2,16). The mechanism for the increased production is unclear, but we have now demonstrated that the association of inflammatory mediators with glycemia during pregnancy spans the full range of glucose below that diagnostic of diabetes. In our large observational study of pregnant women without overt diabetes, we have demonstrated that adiponectin was inversely and CRP and PAI-1 were positively associated with maternal fasting, 1- and 2-h PG, insulin as measured by C-peptide, and BMI. The significant associations with 1- and 2-h PG were independent of BMI and C-peptide. New associations of these molecules with size at birth were also demonstrated. In contrast, although resistin was highest in the highest categories of BMI and C-peptide, after full adjustment for confounders, it was significantly associated only with fasting plasma glucose and was not associated with any measures of size at birth.

Adiponectin is an antiinflammatory adipokine produced primarily by adipocytes, and low plasma levels of adiponectin are associated with insulin resistance in obesity and T2DM (18,19,20). Adiponectin levels are also reduced in women who have had GDM (7,21) and are lower in women with GDM during late pregnancy compared with nondiabetic pregnant controls matched for BMI (6,22,23). In addition, lower levels of adiponectin early in pregnancy are predictive of development of GDM later in pregnancy (24). In the present study, adiponectin was negatively associated with maternal glucose, C-peptide, and BMI across the full range of maternal glucose. In addition, adiponectin levels were negatively associated with birth weight, sum of skinfolds, and percent body fat before and after adjustment for potential confounders including maternal BMI and fasting glucose and C-peptide. A previous study in nonpregnant and normal pregnant women found a significant inverse association between maternal adiponectin and birth weight and included adjustment for maternal BMI (25). However, another larger study, which included 631 non-GDM women, demonstrated no association of birth weight with adiponectin after adjustment for maternal body size, glucose, and insulin (26). A study of women with GDM and normal women found that maternal adiponectin was inversely associated with birth weight but only among those with GDM (27). The larger sample size and power of the present study allowed us to demonstrate a negative association of maternal adiponectin levels with birth weight across the full range of maternal glucose.

Circulating levels of PAI-1, a protein that is an inhibitor of fibrinolysis and is secreted by adipocytes (28), are elevated in normal pregnancy and further elevated in women with GDM (29). Among women with prior GDM, increased PAI-1 levels are associated with insulin resistance and adiposity (30). Another marker of inflammation is CRP, which is associated with incident T2DM in women independent of obesity and other known risk factors for T2DM (31). Elevated CRP has also been shown to be associated with risk of GDM independent of maternal prepregnancy adiposity (32). The association of PAI-1 and CRP levels with glucose in pregnant women without GDM has not previously been reported. We now demonstrate a positive association of CRP and PAI-1 levels with maternal fasting and 1- and 2-h PG as well as fasting C-peptide and BMI. Whether these are primary changes that contribute to pregnancy-induced insulin resistance or are changes secondary to other inflammatory factors remains to be determined.

Given the known association of maternal glycemia and BMI with size at birth (14,33), we also examined the association of maternal CRP and PAI with size at birth. We are not aware of other studies that have examined these inflammatory mediators and birth outcomes. We found a negative association between PAI-1 and sum of skinfolds. Interestingly, although CRP levels are typically increased in the setting of obesity and insulin resistance, after adjustment for gestational age at delivery, maternal BMI, fasting PG, and fasting C-peptide, we found a negative association between CRP and each measurement of newborn size. This suggests that among women who are similar with respect to neonatal gender, gestational age at delivery, BMI, FPG, and fasting C-peptide, those with a lower level of CRP, for example, will have a larger fatter baby. The mechanism for this association will require further study, but this finding is consistent with previous demonstration of a correlation between elevated maternal serum CRP levels and lower birth weight in women with preeclampsia (34).

Circulating levels of resistin, an adipocytokine thought to be a potential marker of inflammation, are increased in pregnancy (35), but findings in women with GDM compared with controls have been inconsistent with higher, lower, and no change in circulating levels of resistin reported (36,37,38). Small sample sizes may have contributed to these disparate findings. In the present study with greater power than these earlier studies, resistin levels were not associated with maternal glucose. This suggests that circulating levels of inflammatory mediators are not uniformly increased in pregnant women, rather specific mediators demonstrated an association with glucose. Resistin was not associated with any of the measures of newborn size. This finding is consistent with the results of two small studies of normal pregnant women and birth weight of their offspring (39,40).

Strengths of the HAPO Study data include availability of glucose results across a broad range, careful and standardized research measurements of maternal height and weight, newborn anthropometrics, and glucose and fasting C-peptide levels (as an index of insulin sensitivity).

Previous studies have demonstrated that lower levels of adiponectin and higher levels of PAI-1 and CRP are associated with risk of (24,32), presence of (20,32), or history of GDM (7,21). We have now demonstrated that a similar association is present across the full range of glucose levels in pregnant women without overt diabetes. This adds to the findings of the main HAPO Study, which showed continuous graded associations of glucose and primary and secondary outcomes (10) and provides support to the hypothesis that inflammatory mediators are associated with glucose across the full range during pregnancy.

Acknowledgments

Members of the HAPO Study Cooperative Research Group are listed in the Appendix of the HAPO Study Cooperative Research Group (10).

Footnotes

The HAPO Study is supported by Grants R01-HD34242 and R01-HD34243 from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development and the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive, and Kidney Diseases, the National Center for Research Resources (Grants M01-RR00048 and M01-RR00080), and the American Diabetes Association. This ancillary study is funded by a Northwestern Memorial Foundation 2008 Dixon Translational Research Grant.

Disclosure Summary: The authors have nothing to disclose.

First Published Online September 15, 2010

Abbreviations: BMI, Body mass index; CRP, C-reactive protein; CV, coefficient of variation; EDD, expected date of delivery; FPG, fasting plasma glucose; GDM, gestational diabetes mellitus; HAPO, Hyperglycemia and Adverse Pregnancy Outcome; OGTT, oral glucose tolerance test; PAI-1, plasminogen activator inhibitor type 1; PG, plasma glucose; RPG, random plasma glucose; T2DM, type 2 diabetes mellitus; US, ultrasound.

References

  1. Dandona P, Aljada A, Bandyopadhyay A 2004 Inflammation: the link between insulin resistance, obesity, and diabetes. Trends Immunol 25:4–7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Richardson AC, Carpenter MW 2007 Inflammatory mediators in gestational diabetes. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 34:213–224 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bo S, Signorile A, Menato G, Gambino R, Bardelli C, Gallo ML, Cassader M, Massobrio M, Pagano GF 2005 C-reactive protein and tumor necrosis factor-alpha in gestational hyperglycemia. J Endocrinol Invest 28:779–786 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Kinalski M, Telejko B, KuŸmicki M, Kretowski A, Kinalska I 2005 Tumor necrosis factor α system and plasma adiponectin concentration in women with gestational diabetes. Horm Metab Res 37:450–454 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Wolf M, Sauk J, Shah A, Vossen Smirnakis K, Jimenez-Kimble R, Ecker JL, Thadhani R 2004 Inflammation and glucose tolerance: a prospective study of gestational diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care 27:21–27 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Williams MA, Qiu C, Muy-Rivera M, Vadachkoria S, Song T, Luthy DA 2004 Plasma adiponectin concentrations in early pregnancy and subsequent risk of gestational diabetes mellitus. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 89:2306–2311 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Heitritter SM, Solomon CG, Mitchell GF, Skali-Ounis N, Seely EW 2005 Subclinical inflammation and vascular dysfunction in women with previous gestational diabetes mellitus. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 90:3983–3988 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Schmidt MI, Duncan BB, Sharrett AR, Lindberg G, Savage PJ, Offenbacher S, Azambuja MI, Tracy RP, Heiss G 1999 Markers of inflammation and prediction of diabetes mellitus in adults (Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities study): a cohort study. Lancet 353:1649–1652 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. HAPO Study Cooperative Research Group 2002 The hyperglycemia and adverse pregnancy outcome (HAPO) study. Int J Gynecol Obstet 78:69–77 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Metzger BE, Lowe LP, Dyer AR, Trimble ER, Chaovarindr U, Coustan DR, Hadden DR, McCance DR, Hod M, McIntyre HD, Oats JJ, Persson B, Rogers MS, Sacks DA 2008 Hyperglycemia and adverse pregnancy outcomes. N Engl J Med 358:1991–2002 [Google Scholar]
  11. Nesbitt GS, Smye M, Sheridan B, Lappin TR, Trimble ER 2006 Integration of local and central laboratory functions in a worldwide multicentre study. Experience from the hyperglycemia and adverse pregnancy outcome (HAPO) study. Clin Trials 3:397–407 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. O'Rahilly S, Burnett MA, Smith RF, Darley JH, Turner RC 1987 Haemolysis affects insulin but not C-peptide immunoassay. Diabetologia 30:394–396. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Catalano PM, Thomas AJ, Avallone DA, Amini SB 1995 Anthropometric estimation of neonatal body composition. Am J Obstet Gynecol 173:1176–1181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. HAPO Study Cooperative Research Group 2010 Hyperglycaemia and Adverse Pregnancy Outcome (HAPO) Study: associations with maternal body mass index. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 117:575–584 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Metzger BE, Gabbe SG, Persson B, Buchanan TA, Catalano PA, Damm P, Dyer AR, Leiva A, Hod M, Kitzmiler JL, Lowe LP, McIntyre HD, Oats JJ, Omori Y, Schmidt MI 2010 International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups recommendations on the diagnosis and classification of hyperglycemia in pregnancy. Diabetes Care 33:676–682 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Haugel-de Mouzon S, Guerre-Millo M 2006 The placenta cytokine network and inflammatory signals. Placenta 27:794–798. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Struwe E, Berzl GM, Schild RL, Dötsch J 2009 Gene expression of placental hormones regulating energy balance in small for gestational age neonates. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 142:38–42 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Weyer C, Funahashi T, Tanaka S, Hotta K, Matsuzawa Y, Pratley RE, Tataranni PA 2001 Hypoadiponectinemia in obesity and type 2 diabetes: close association with insulin resistance and hyperinsulinemia. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 86:1930–1935 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Worda C, Leipold H, Gruber C, Kautzky-Willer A, Knofler M, Bancher-Todesca D 2004 Decreased plasma adiponectin concentrations in women with gestational diabetes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 191:2120–2124 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Cseh K, Baranyi E, Melczer Z, Kaszás E, Palik E, Winkler G 2004 Plasma adiponectin and pregnancy-induced insulin resistance. Diabetes Care 27:274–275 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Winzer C, Wagner O, Festa A, Schneider B, Roden M, Bancher-Todesca D, Pacini G, Funahashi T, Kautzky-Willer A 2004 Plasma adiponectin, insulin sensitivity, and subclinical inflammation in women with prior gestational diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care 27:1721–1727 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Ranheim T, Haugen F, Staff AC, Braekke K, Harsem NK, Drevon CA 2004 Adiponectin is reduced in gestational diabetes mellitus in normal weight women. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 83:341–347 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Atègbo JM, Grissa O, Yessoufou A, Hichami A, Dramane KL, Moutairou K, Miled A, Grissa A, Jerbi M, Tabka Z, Khan NA 2006 Modulation of adipokines and cytokines in gestational diabetes and macrosomia. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 91:4137–4143 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Lain KY, Daftary AR, Ness RB, Roberts JM 2008 First trimester adipocytokine concentrations and risk of developing gestational diabetes later in pregnancy. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 69:407–411 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Lopez-Bermejo A, Fernandez-Real JM, Garrido E, Rovira R, Brichs R, Genaro P, Bach C, Cabrero D, Kihara S, Funahashi T, Vendrell J, Ricart W 2004 Maternal soluble tumour necrosis factor receptor type 2 (sTNFR2) and adiponectin are both related to blood pressure during gestation and infant’s birthweight. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 61:544–552 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Verhaeghe J, van Bree R, Van Herck E 2006 Maternal body size and birth weight: can insulin or adipokines do better? Metabolism 55:339–344 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Tsai PJ, Yu CH, Hsu SP, Lee YH, Huang IT, Ho SC, Chu CH 2005 Maternal plasma adiponectin concentrations at 24 to 31 weeks of gestation: negative association with gestational diabetes mellitus. Nutrition 21:1095–1099 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Kershaw EE, Flier JS 2004 Adipose tissue as an endocrine organ. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 89:2548–2556 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Akinci B, Demir T, Saygili S, Yener S, Alacacioglu I, Saygili F, Bayraktar F, Yesil S 2008 Gestational diabetes has no additional effect on plasma thrombin-activatable fibrinolysis inhibitor antigen levels beyond pregnancy. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 81:93–96 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Farhan S, Winzer C, Tura A, Quehenberger P, Bieglmaier C, Wagner OF, Huber K, Waldhäusl W, Pacini G, Kautzky-Willer A 2006 Fibrinolytic dysfunction in insulin-resistant women with previous gestational diabetes. Eur J Clin Invest 36:345–352 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Hu G, Jousilahti P, Tuomilehto J, Antikainen R, Sundvall J, Salomaa V 2009 Association of serum C-reactive protein level with sex-specific type 2 diabetes risk: a prospective Finnish study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 94:2099–2105 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Qiu C, Sorensen T, Luthy DA, Williams MA 2004 A prospective study of maternal serum C-reactive protein (CRP) concentrations and risk of gestational diabetes. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 18:377–384 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. HAPO Study Cooperative Research Group 2009 Hyperglycemia and Adverse Pregnancy Outcome (HAPO) Study: associations with neonatal anthropometrics. Diabetes 58:453–459 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Guven MA, Coskun A, Ertas IE, Aral M, Zencirci B, Oksuz H 2009 Association of maternal serum CRP, IL-6, TNF-α, homocysteine, folic acid and vitamin B12 levels with the severity of preeclampsia and fetal birth weight. Hypertens Pregnancy 28:190–200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Palik E, Baranyi E, Melczer Z, Audikovszky M, Szöcs A, Winkler G, Cseh K 2007 Elevated serum acylated (biologically active) ghrelin and resistin levels associate with pregnancy-induced weight gain and insulin resistance. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 76:351–357 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Kuzmicki M, Telejko B, Szamatowicz J, Zonenberg A, Nikolajuk A, Kretowski A, Gorska M 2009 High resistin and interleukin-6 levels are associated with gestational diabetes mellitus. Gynecol Endocrinol 25:258–263 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Cortelazzi D, Corbetta S, Ronzoni S, Pelle F, Marconi A, Cozzi V, Cetin I, Cortelazzi R, Beck-Peccoz P, Spada A 2007 Maternal and foetal resistin and adiponectin concentrations in normal and complicated pregnancies. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 66:447–453 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Megia A, Vendrell J, Gutierrez C, Sabaté M, Broch M, Fernández-Real JM, Simón I 2008 Insulin sensitivity and resistin levels in gestational diabetes mellitus and after parturition. Eur J Endocrinol 158:173–178 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Jansson N, Nilsfelt A, Gellerstedt M, Wennergren M, Rossander-Hulthén L, Powell TL, Jansson T 2008 Maternal hormones linking maternal body mass index and dietary intake to birth weight. Am J Clin Nutr 87:1743–1749 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Cho GJ, Yoo SW, Hong SC, Oh MJ, Kim T, Kim HJ, Lee KW, Kim SH 2006 Correlations between umbilical and maternal serum resistin levels and neonatal birth weight. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 85:1051–1056 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism are provided here courtesy of The Endocrine Society

RESOURCES