Skip to main content
. 2010 Feb;47(1):97–124. doi: 10.1353/dem.0.0087

Table 8.

Percentages of the Unadjusted Changes in Parity Progression Ratios (PPR), Mean and Median Failure Times, TFR, and TMFR Between the 1993 and 2003 Surveys That Are Explained by Residence and Education (pooled data analysis)

Transition Measure Period Analysis, Five-Year Period Before Each Survey Cohort Analysis, Women Aged 40–44 at Each Survey
B–M PPR (pB) −14.1* −175.6
Mean Am −33.1 434.9
Median Am −45.2 1,075.9
M–1 PPR (pM) 0.7 −5.8
Mean CBI −6.4 −124.7
Median CBI −20.8 −46.5
1–2 PPR (p1) 7.7 3.2
Mean CBI 13.6* 9.3
Median CBI 11.5* 15.6
2–3 PPR (p2) 8.8 8.1
Mean CBI 11.9** 21.0*
Median CBI 13.7** 26.7*
3–4 PPR (p3) 9.0 24.4*
Mean CBI 4.3 28.5
Median CBI 4.0 24.0
4–5 PPR (p4) 7.2 18.4
Mean CBI 8.5 9.7
Median CBI 9.9* 12.5
5–6 PPR (p5) 7.3 16.0
Mean CBI 15.2 −359.1
Median CBI 12.4 439.4
6–7 PPR (p6) −5.7 31.8
Mean CBI 14.3 5.6
Median CBI 16.8 6.0
7+–8+ PPR (p7+) 6.4 −8.3
Mean CBI 12.8 32.9
Median CBI 4.1 20.3
TFR 18.4** 25.4
TMFR 11.1** 22.0

Notes: Percentages in this table are calculated using more exact values than shown in Table 7. One or more asterisks after a percentage indicate that the percentage differs significantly zero (see Appendix B). All tests of statistical significance are two-tailed tests.

a

Reference category.

*

p ≤ .05;

**

p ≤ .01