Skip to main content
. 2010 Aug;47(3):755–775. doi: 10.1353/dem.0.0112

Table 3.

Predictors of Making Normal Progress 3 rough Primary School, for Own Children of Nontraditional Family Types Compared With Own Children of Heterosexual Married Couples: Selected Coefficients From Logistic Regressions

Variable Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 Model 4 Model 5
Family Type (heterosexual, married)
 Same-sex couple cohabiting −0.267* −0.112 −0.116 −0.128 −0.142
 Separated, divorced, widowed women −0.529*** −0.422*** −0.321*** −0.312*** −0.311***
 Heterosexual, cohabiting −0.547*** −0.271*** −0.202*** −0.207*** −0.236***
 Separated, divorced, widowed men −0.558*** −0.467*** −0.427*** −0.402*** −0.397***
 Never-married women −0.623*** −0.319*** −0.088* −0.116** −0.145***
 Never-married men −0.675*** −0.400*** −0.274* −0.308* −0.354**
Ln of Household Income 0.035*** 0.026*** 0.021*** 0.013*
Head of Household’s Education (less than high school)
 High school diploma 0.507*** 0.518*** 0.515*** 0.511***
 Some college 0.828*** 0.839*** 0.804*** 0.767***
 College degree+ 1.118*** 1.105*** 1.026*** 0.988***
Child Is U.S.-Born 0.622*** 0.599*** 0.629***
Child’s Gender: Female 0.283*** 0.282*** 0.280***
Child Has Disability
 Difficulty with memory −0.911*** −0.899*** −0.893***
 Physical disability −0.376*** −0.363*** −0.362***
 Hearing or vision disability −0.401*** −0.394*** −0.377***
 Personal care limitation −0.207** −0.235*** −0.244***
Child’s Race/Ethnicity (non-Hispanic white)
 Non-Hispanic black −0.342*** −0.371*** −0.270***
 Hispanic 0.181*** 0.111*** 0.009
 Asian American 0.275*** 0.199*** 0.006
Metropolitan Status (rural)
 City 0.301*** 0.152***
 Suburbs 0.377*** 0.235***
Grade Attending: Grades 5–8 −0.248*** −0.248***
School Type: Private School 0.154*** 0.172***
State Dummy Variables Yes
Constant 4.094*** 3.092*** 2.524*** 2.532*** 2.723***
Unweighted N 716,764 716,764 716,764 716,740 716,740
df 7 11 21 27 77
Log-Likelihood −65,352 −64,284 −63,315 −63,080 −62,561

Notes: Comparison categories are in parentheses. Some categories of metro status and race/ethnicity are excluded for clarity. With the omission of children of couples whose dual marital status was recoded, and combining gay and lesbian couples, coefficients for children of same-sex couples would be −0.691*, −0.452, −0.361, −0.392;, and −0.427 in Models 1–5, respectively (statistically significant only in Model 1).

Source: Census 2000 microdata, via IPUMS.

*

p < .05;

**

p < .01;

***

p < .001