Table 3.
CPM analysis
Sample | S3.1 | S3.2 | S4.1 | S4.2 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ΦBF (initial weight) [10−3] | 1.9 | 1.9 | 0.38 | 0.38 |
2 | ΦMin (initial weight) [10−3] | 0.314 | 0.314 | 0.314 | 0.314 |
3 | VCPM [10−20 cm3] | 9.7 | 11.7 | 10.7 | 10.8 |
4 | ΦCPM [10−3] | 1.90 ± 0.02 | 1.98 ± 0.03 | 0.58 ± 0.02 | 0.64 ± 0.03 |
5 | ΦBF (CPM) [10−3] | 1.80 | 1.80 | 0.36 | 0.36 |
6 | ΦMin (CPM) [10−3] | 0.10 ± 0.02 | 0.18 ± 0.02 | 0.22 ± 0.02 | 0.28 ± 0.03 |
7 | ΦMin = ΦMin/ΦMin (initial weight) | 0.32 ± 0.07 | 0.57 ± 0.07 | 0.70 ± 0.07 | 0.89 ± 0.10 |
8 | CMin (CPM) [%] | 5.3 ± 1.1 | 9.1 ± 1 | 38 ± 4 | 44 ± 5 |
Referring to a previous study, we assumed that ∼95% of the total BF is not involved in CPP formation (9).