Skip to main content
. 2010 Nov;161(6):1276–1290. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2010.00879.x

Table 1.

Data point distributions investigated in the simulated concentration–response curves

Highest concentration Dilution factor Replicates per dilution Lowest concentration pEC50 (mean ± SD) Slope (95% CI)
1 × 10−6 1:3 1 1.7 × 10−11 8.53 ± 0.12 0.56–1.55
1 × 10−7 1:2 1 9.8 × 10−11 8.51 ± 0.15 0.57–1.76
4 × 10−7 1:2.5 1 4.2 × 10−11 8.51 ± 0.12 0.61–1.63
1 × 10−6 1:16 2 1.5 × 10−11 8.52 ± 0.13* 0.47–2.10
1 × 10−6 1:10 2 1.0 × 10−10 8.53 ± 0.13 0.65–1.54
1 × 10−7 1:6 2 7.7 × 10−11 8.51 ± 0.13! 0.44–2.04
1 × 10−7 1:10 3 1.0 × 10−9 8.50 ± 0.12 0.64–1.50

Note a ‘buffer control’ (i.e. no agonist added) was included for every simulated curve with the same number of replicates as all other dilutions. The pEC50 and slope columns of the table summarize the variability in the estimates of these parameters for the fitted curves in each simulation.

*

Seven curves in this set could not be fitted.

!

One curve in this set could not be fitted.