Skip to main content
. 2010 Nov-Dec;17(6):631–636. doi: 10.1136/jamia.2009.000794

Table 1.

Characteristics of studies included in the systematic review

Author Date published Study type Intervention Study location Sample size Score Unit of analysis Confounding and clustering in analysis Outcome measured Results (+: statistically significant change in monitoring rate / –: no effect of the intervention on the monitoring rate)
Feldstein18 2006 RCT–cluster–randomized by clinic EMR reminder via email as well as two other interventions OR: Kaiser Permanente HMO, 15 primary care clinics 44 PCPs with 196 patients in EMR arm 25 Patient Yes Completed monitoring +: EMR reminder ↑ baseline laboratory monitoring of 10 medications, from 22.4% to 48.5%: 26.1% absolute ↑/116% relative ↑; HR of 2.5, but less effective than voice message or pharmacy outreach
Hoch19 2003 Pre–post no control EMR reminder via email Israel: HMO 504 physicians 18 Patient No Completed monitoring +: Reminders to clinicians ↑ potassium testing (78.5→81.5%; 3.0% absolute effect; 9.8% relative; p<0.001)
Lo20 2009 RCT EMR reminder MA: Partners HealthCare 22 primary care clinics; 3673 events among 2765 patients 23 Clinic visit Yes Ordering –: Reminders did not improve ordering of laboratory monitoring significantly
Matheny6 2008 RCT EMR reminder MA: Partners HealthCare 1922 patients seen by 303 physicians in 2507 clinic visits 24 Clinic visit Yes Completed monitoring –: Reminders did not improve laboratory monitoring significantly
Palen21 2006 RCT EMR reminder CO: Kaiser HMO 207 PCPs with6 20 104 in the intervention arm caring for 26586 patients 22 Dispensing (first) No Completed monitoring –: Reminders did not improve laboratory monitoring significantly. Significant improvement for selected medications.
Raebel22 2005 RCT Pharmacists reminded electronically about missing tests and then ordered them and reminded patients CO: Kaiser HMO 10169 drug dispensings for 9565 patients 23 Dispensing (each unique initial drug dispensing) No Completed monitoring +: Statistically significant ↑ monitoring in the intervention group, varying widely by medication (70.2→79.1% overall; 8.9% absolute effect; 12.6% relative; p<0.001)
Raebel23 2006 RCT Pharmacists reminded electronically about missing tests and then ordered them and reminded patients CO: Kaiser HMO 9139 patients with 4871 patient–drug combinations 22 Patient–drug combination (ongoing therapy) No Completed monitoring +: Statistically significant improved monitoring in the intervention group for only some of the medications (58→64% overall; 6% absolute effect; 10% relative; p<0.001)
Steele24 2005 Pre–post, no control EMR reminder CO: Safety net outpatient clinics Rule processed 16291 times; 19076 patients seen during the time period 16 Orders No Ordering +: Increased ordering of the rule-associated laboratory test when an alert was displayed (39→51%; 12% absolute effect; 31% relative; p < 0.001)

↑, increase; CO, Colorado; EMR, electronic medical record; HMO, health maintenance organization; HR, hazard ratio; MA, Massachusetts; OR, Oregon; PCP, primary care physician; RCT, randomized controlled trial.