Skip to main content
. 2010 Dec 6;4:1441–1446. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S14573

Table 1.

Time course of standardized blur ratio after TES in optic disc and macula

Time course (h)
Pre Im(0) 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 24 40
Midway between optic disc and macula TES Subject 1 1.00 1.21 0.98 1.05 1.01 1.01 1.01 1.07 1.23 1.05
Subject 2 1.00 1.40 1.37 1.53 1.46 1.38 1.16 1.82 1.64 1.29
Subject 3 1.00 0.96 0.88 1.76 1.60 1.64 1.48 1.23 1.53 1.51
Subject 4 1.00 1.35 1.01 1.18 1.17 1.19 1.15 1.46 1.34 1.25
Subject 5 1.00 1.10 1.08 1.03 1.14 1.09 1.02 1.21 1.05 0.97
Subject 6 1.00 1.25 1.91 1.79 1.16 1.35 1.74 1.27 1.59 1.06
Mean ± SEM 1.21 ± 0.07* 1.21 ± 0.16 1.39 ± 0.14 1.26 ± 0.09 1.28 ± 0.09 1.26 ± 0.12 1.34 ± 0.11* 1.40 ± 0.09** 1.19 ± 0.08
Sham Subject 1 1.00 1.01 0.96 1.06 0 99 0.95 0.87 1.06 1.05 1.07
Subject 2 1.00 0.83 0.75 0.79 0.94 0.92 0.96 0.66 0.84 0.89
Subject 3 1.00 0.87 1.05 1.18 1.24 1.23 1.25 1.10 0.91 1.21
Subject 4 1.00 0.98 0.99 1.06 0.98 0.97 0.97 0.95 0.97 0.83
Mean ± SEM 0.92 ± 0.04 0.94 ± 0.07 1.03 ± 0.08 1.04 ± 0.07 1.02 ± 0.07 1.01 ± 0.08 0.94 ± 0.10 0.94 ± 0.05 1.00 ± 0.09
Optic disc
TES Subject 1 1.00 1.45 1.02 0.97 1.04 0.99 1.20 1.22 0.78 1.00
Subject 2 1.00 1.35 1.39 1.66 1.27 0.97 1.33 1.78 1.43 1.15
Subject 3 1.00 1.32 1.03 1.12 1.25 1.09 1.27 1.07 0.91 1.04
Subject 4 1.00 1.24 0.74 0.86 1.17 1.04 1.03 1.05 1.68 1 38
Subject 5 1.00 1.27 1.45 1.17 1.75 1.16 1.02 0.90 1.59 1.46
Subject 6 1.00 1.75 2.24 1.58 1.50 1.70 2.18 1.61 1.83 1.20
Mean ± SEM 1.40 ± 0.08 1.31 ± 0.21 1.23 ± 0.13 1.33 ± 0.10 1.16 ± 0.11 1.34 ± 0.18 1.27 ± 0.14 1.37 ± 0.18 1.20 ± 0.08
Sham Subject 1 1.00 1.19 1.38 1.30 1.07 1.05 0.91 1.16 0.91 0.99
Subject 2 1.00 1.25 1.20 1.11 1.07 0.96 1.03 0.92 0.90 1.08
Subject 3 1.00 1.06 0.96 1.43 1.72 1.40 1.35 1.19 1.06 1.12
Subject 4 1.00 1.05 1.10 1.17 0.93 1.02 0.89 0.99 0.79 0.93
Mean ± SEM 1.14 ± 0.05 1.16 ± 0.09 1.25 ± 0.07 1.12 ± 0.18 1.11 ± 0.10 1.05 ± 0.11 1.07 ± 0.07 0.91 ± 0.05 1.03 ± 0.04
Macula
TES Subject 1 1.00 1.30 1.16 1.18 1.07 1.11 1.21 1.21 1.38 1.29
Subject 2 1.00 1.03 0.92 1.06 1.33 1.14 0.95 1.34 1.40 1.23
Subject 3 1.00 0.82 1.06 1.21 1.39 1.17 1.15 1.29 1.32 1.94
Subject 4 1.00 1.40 1.28 1.40 1.62 1.48 1.76 2.07 1.95 1.62
Subject 5 1.00 1.17 1.61 0.97 1.03 1.04 1.22 1.32 1.76 2.44
Subject 6 1.00 1.22 1.74 1.41 0.96 1.43 1.59 1.19 1.39 1.04
Mean ± SEM 1.16 ± 0.09 1.30 ± 0.13 1.20 ± 0.07 1.23 ± 0.10 1.23 ± 0.07 1.31 ± 0.12 1.40 ± 0.14* 1.53 ± 0.11** 1.59 ± 0.21
Sham Subject 1 1.00 0.75 0.75 0.81 0.89 0.83 0.71 0.84 0.85 0.96
Subject 2 1.00 0.98 1.02 0.87 1.05 1.17 1.08 0.84 0.84 1.03
Subject 3 1.00 0.92 0.96 1.14 1.24 1.37 1.24 1.05 0.97 1.18
Subject 4 1.00 1.05 1.06 1.05 1.06 1.05 0.79 0.86 0.80 0.95
Mean ± SEM 0.92 ± 0.06 0.95 ± 0.07 0.97 ± 0.08 1.06 ± 0.07 1.10 ± 0.11 0.96 ± 0.12 0.90 ± 0.05 0.86 ± 0.04 1.03 ± 0.05

Notes: At the point midway between the optic disc and macula and macula area, the standardized blur ratio was significantly increased from 3 h after TES. Two-way repeated measures ANOVA followed by unpaired t-test,

*

P < 0.05,

**

P < 0.01.