Skip to main content
. 2010 Dec 6;4:1441–1446. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S14573

Table 2.

Changes of ocular and systemic parameters in the subjects with TES or sham stimulation

Time course (h)
Pre Im(0) 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 24 40
PR (/min) TES 72 ± 8.3 68 ± 7.2 69 ± 9.0 67 ± 8.9 65 ± 7.3 67 ± 5.5 64 ± 5.6 68 ± 9.6 75 ± 7.3 75 ± 8.3
Sham 64 ± 13 64 ± 12 60 ± 14 59 ± 7.9 58 ± 6.2 55 ± 3.4 57 ± 9.4 59 ± 9.5 65 ± 7.0 61 ± 12
IOP (mm Hg) TES 13 ± 2.0 11 ± 1.4 12 ± 1.5 12 ± 1.2 12 ± 1.3 12 ± 1.7 12 ± 2.0 12 ± 2.1 13 ± 1.1 12 ± 1.3
Sham 14 ± 3.0 15 ± 3.4 16 ± 2.8 14 ± 2.3 14 ± 2.8 14 ± 2.5 15 ± 2.4 14 ± 2.2 14 ± 4.1 14 ± 3.2
MBP (mm Hg) TES 13 ± 2.0 11 ± 1.4 12 ± 1.5 12 ± 1.2 12 ± 1.3 12 ± 1.7 12 ± 1.9 12 ± 2.1 13 ± 1.1 12 ± 1.3
Sham 74 ± 7.3 78 ± 6.0 79 ± 5.7 78 ± 12 75 ± 9.1 0 ± 3.1 69 ± 8.4 75 ± 8.1 69 ± 4.3 74 ± 8.0
OPP TES 36 ± 2.4 34 ± 3.0 34 ± 5.6 32 ± 6.0 30 ± 6.0 36 ± 5.2 39 ± 4.2 31 ± 5.6 35 ± 2.1 37 ± 4.5
Sham 35 ± 5.2 37 ± 6.3 37 ± 3.4 38 ± 10 36 ± 8.7 39 ± 2.6 30 ± 7.0 36 ± 6.0 32 ± 6.3 35 ± 3.4

Notes: All parameters are not significantly different between prestimulation and each measurement point. The data are the means ± standard deviations.

Abbreviations: MBP, mean blood pressure; OPP, ocular perfusion pressure; PR, pulse rate. TES and sham stimulation group have six and four subjects, respectively. Statistical analyses were performed by two-way repeated measures ANOVA with post hoc test, unpaired Student t-tests.