Skip to main content
. 2010 Dec 10;5(12):e14276. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0014276

Table 1. Results of LRT for selection of the CYP3 family in Actinopterygii.

Model np Estimates of parameters lnL LRT pairs df 2ΔlnL
M0: one ratio 1 ω = 0.22 −29204.69
M3: discrete 5 p0 = 0.28,p1 = 0.45,(p2 = 0.27), ω0 = 0.03, ω1 = 0.20, ω2 = 0.55 −28506.07 M0/M3 4 1394.24**
M1a: neutral 2 p0 = 0.75,(p1 = 0.25), ω0 = 0.17,(ω1 = 1.00) −28832.23
M2a: selection 4 p0 = 0.75,p1 = 0.09,(p2 = 0.16), ω0 = 0.17,(ω1 = 1.00), ω2 = 1.00 −28832.23 M1a/M2a 2 0
M7: beta 2 p = 0.77, q = 2.25 −28496.45
M8: beta&ω 4 p0 = 0.98, p = 0.82,q = 2.56, (p1 = 0.017), ω = 1.14 −28494.39 M7/M8 2 4.12
Fr: free ratios 66 (see Figure 2) −29068.70 M0/Fr 65 271.98**
Ta: two ratios 2 ω0 = 0.24, ωa = 0.17 −29186.20 M0/Ta 1 26.98**
Tb: two ratios 2 ω0 = 0.22, ωb = 0.16 −29198.04 M0/Tb 1 13.30**
Tc: two ratios 2 ω0 = 0.21, ωc = 0.40 −29202.33 M0/Tc 1 4.72*
Td: two ratios 2 ω0 = 0.21, ω d  = 1.25 −29196.13 M0/Td 1 17.12**
Te: two ratios 2 ω0 = 0.21, ωe = 0.27 −29202.86 M0/Te 1 3.66
Tf: two ratios 2 ω0 = 0.21, ωf = 0.56 −29197.39 M0/Tf 1 14.60**
A 4 p0 = 0.70, p1 = 0.23, (p2a = 0.05, p2b = 0.02), ω0 = 0.17,(ω1 = 1.00), b: ω2a = 0.17, ω2b = 1.00, f: ω 2a  = 12.83, ω 2b  = 12.83 −28827.71
A1 3 p0 = 0.52, p1 = 0.17, (p2a = 0.23, p2b = 0.08), ω0 = 0.17,(ω1 = 1.00), b: ω2a = 0.17, ω2b = 1.00, f: ω2a = 1.00, ω2b = 1.00 −28830.08 A/A1 1 4.74*

Selection analysis by three kinds of models was performed using codeml implemented in PAML. np: number of free parameters. lnL: log likelihood. LRT: likelihood ratio test. df: degrees of freedom. 2ΔlnL: twice the log-likelihood difference of the models compared. The significant tests at 5% cutoff are labeled with * and at 1% cutoff are labeled with **.