Table 1.
Assayed under the optimal condition for each catalytic entity |
Assayed under the optimal condition for the holoenzyme with four RPPs (30 mM Mg2+, 800 mM NH4+ |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Max. kobsa, min−1 | KM(STO)a, µM | [NH4+], M | [Mg2+], M | Relative | kobs, min−1 | Relative | ||
max. kobs | kobs | |||||||
Mth RPR | 0.13 ± 0.01 | 21.3 ± 2.6 | 2.0 | 0.50 | 1 | Mth RPR (3 µM) | b | – |
Mth RPR + RPP21•RPP29 | 0.13 ± 0.01 | 1.4 ± 0.2 | 0.8 | 0.12 | 1 | Mth RPR + RPP21•RPP29 | b | – |
Mth RPR + POP5•RPP30 | 7.9 ± 1 | 11.8 ± 2.3 | 0.8 | 0.12 | ∼60 | Mth RPR + POP5•RPP30 | 0.016 ± 0.0004 | 1 |
Mth RPR + Both binary RPP complexes | 7.5 ± 0.14c | 1.2 ± 0.1 | 0.8 | 0.03 | ∼60 | Mth RPR + Both binary RPP complexes | 5.5 ± 0.18c | ∼344 |
aThe standard errors of the curve fits shown in Figure 7 are indicated in the estimates of max. kobs and KM(STO).
bReliable data could not be obtained due to weak or negligible activity.
cAll experiments were performed at pH 5.8, except for Mth RPR reconstituted with both binary RPP complexes, which was assayed at pH 5.4. After establishing a slope of approximately 1 in a plot of log kobs versus pH (see Supplementary Figure S6), we multiplied the maximal rate observed at pH 5.4 by 2.5 to obtain the rate that would have been observed at pH 5.8 should it have been measurable.