Skip to main content
. 2010 Oct;99(3):220–231. doi: 10.1111/j.1423-0410.2010.01345.x

Table 4.

Immunoglobulin G subclass contents of plasma pools collected from Group I, II, III and IV donors

Donors
IgG subclass (g/l) Group In = 51 Group IIn = 5 Group IIIn = 8 Group IVn = 41
IgG1 4·67 ± 0·63b 5·01 ± 0·11 3·66 ± 0·60 3·40 ± 0·66
% Variationa +7% −22% −27%
P-value > 0·05 < 0·0001 < 0·0001
IgG2 2·57 ± 0·22 2·66 ± 0·06 2·14 ± 0·19 1·80 ± 0·17
% Variation +3% −17% −30%
P-value > 0·05 < 0·0001 < 0·0001
IgG3 0·34 ± 0·03 0·32 ± 0·03 0·31 ± 0·03 0·31 ± 0·02
% Variation −5% −8% −8%
P-value > 0·05 < 0·05 < 0·0001
IgG4 0·46 ± 0·05 0·45 ± 0·02 0·44 ± 0·03 0·34 ± 0·03
% Variation −1% −2% −26%
P-value > 0·05 > 0·05 < 0·0001

IgG subclass levels were determined in Group II (n = 5), Group III (n = 8), and Group IV (n = 41) plasma pools and compared with those of Group I plasma pools (n = 51).

a

Percent variations with respect to Group I donation pool values taken as 100%.

b

The results are means of the tested batches ± SD. IgG subclass contents were measured by nephelometry. P < 0·0001 is considered highly significant.