Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Dec 14.
Published in final edited form as: J Mem Lang. 2009 Apr 1;60(3):329–350. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2008.12.002.

Table 2.

Results of univariate ANOVAs for Repeated Reading of Tongue Twisters (Experiment 1)a.

Tongue twister Position Tongue twister × Position
Speech errors
 Substitutions
 Noncontextual
  Phoneme F1(1,15) = 2.85, p > .1 F1(3,45) = 2.90, p < .05 F1(3,45) = 3.577, p < .05
F2(1,27) = 1.25, p > .2 F2(3,81) = 1.14, p > .30 F2(3,81) = 2.61, p = .057
minF′(1,42) = 0.87, p > .6 min′(3,123) = 0.82, p > .4 minF′(3,124) = 1.51, p > .20
 Contextual
  Phoneme F1(1,15) = 10.26, p < .01 F1(3,45) = 0.45, p > .7 F1(3,45) = 6.75, p < .001
F2(1,27) = 11.13, p < .01 F2(3,81) = 0.52, p > .6 F2(3,81) = 6.56, p < .001
minF(1,38) = 5.34, p < .05 minF′(3,111) = 0.24, p > .7 minF(3,117) = 3.33, p < .05
  Item F1(1,15) = 12.90, p < .01 F1(3,45) = 0.77, p > .5 F1(3,45) = 5.17, p < .01
F2(1,27) = 17.16, p < .001 F2(3,81) = 1.04, p > .3 F2(3,81) = 6.37, p < .01
minF(1,35) = 7.36, p < .02 minF′(3,104) = 0.44,p > .5 minF(3,112) = 3.01, p < .05
 Omissions
  Phoneme F1(1,15) = 0.54 F1(3,45) = 2.43, p < .08 F1(3,45) = 0.74, p > .5
F2(1,27) = 1.09, p > .3 F2(3,81) = 1.20, p > .3 F2(3,81) = 1.08, p > .3
minF0(1,30) = 0.36, p > .7 minF0(3,126) = 0.8, p > .6 minF0(3,101) = 0.44, p > .7
  Item F1(1,15) = 2.01, p > .1 F1(3,45) = 1, p > .4 F1(3,45) = 0.4, p > .7
F2(1,27) = 8.64, p < .01 F2(3,81) = 0.84, p > .4 F2(3,81) = 0.35, p > .8
minF′(1,22) = 1.63, p > .2 minF′(3,121) = 0.46, p > .5 minF′(3,120) = 0.19, p > .7
 Additions
  Phoneme F1(1,15) = 0.05, p > .8 F1(3,45) = 3.39, p < .03 F1(3,45) = 0.56, p > .6
F2(1,27) = 0.14, p > .7 F2(3,81) = 1.58, p > .2 F2(3,81) = 0.90, p > .4
minF′(1,26) = 0.04, p > .8 minF′(3,125) = 1.08, p > .3 minF′(3,97) = 0.35, p > .6
a

Bold font indicates a significant difference (p < .5); Italic font indicates a trend towards significance (.05 < p < .10).