Skip to main content
. 2010 Nov 24;93(1):19–26. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.2010.29667

TABLE 4.

Odds ratios (and 95% CIs) from a logistic regression analysis of baseline adipokines as predictors of the development of the metabolic syndrome at the 3-y follow-up by tertile (T)1

T1 T2 T3 P for trend
Adiponectin (μg/mL) 2.42–11.04 11.19–18.47 18.66–41.08
 Model 1 1.0 0.10 (0.01, 1.04) 0.07 (0.01, 0.73) 0.017
 Model 2 1.0 0.10 (0.01, 0.91) 0.08 (0.01, 0.79)
 Model 3 1.0 0.27 (0.03, 2.65) 0.15 (0.01, 1.76)
 Model 4 1.0 0.16 (0.02, 1.20) 0.10 (0.01, 1.02)
RBP4 (μg/mL) 24.1–55.2 55.5–67.8 67.8–108.0
 Model 1 1.0 5.42 (0.61, 48.04) 4.25 (0.46, 39.31) 0.252
 Model 2 1.0 5.31 (0.59, 47.42) 3.12 (0.32, 30.86)
 Model 3 1.0 6.38 (0.58, 69.68) 1.99 (0.17, 23.12)
 Model 4 1.0 9.93 (0.77–127.6) 2.56 (0.29, 22.84)
A-FABP (μg/L) 5.0–11.0 12.0–17.0 18.0–43.0
 Model 1 1.0 1.09 (0.06, 18.81) 10.82 (1.15, 101.52) 0.005
 Model 2 1.0 1.02 (0.06, 16.79) 9.56 (1.15, 79.64)
 Model 3 1.0 1.29 (0.08, 21.47) 12.00 (1.34, 107.36)
 Model 4 1.0 1.90 (0.08, 44.66) 17.33 (1.25, 239.76)
1

RBP4, retinol-binding protein 4; A-FABP, adipocyte fatty acid–binding protein. Model 1 was adjusted for Tanner stage; model 2 was adjusted for Tanner stage and homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) at baseline; model 3 was adjusted for Tanner stage, HOMA-IR at baseline, and BMI at baseline; and model 4 was adjusted for Tanner stage, sleep duration, physical activity, HOMA-IR at baseline, and BMI at baseline. The interaction models were not significant.