Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Aug 6.
Published in final edited form as: Demogr Res. 2010 Aug 6;23:293–334. doi: 10.4054/DemRes.2010.23.11

Table 3.

Participant responses, item and step fit, and Item Characteristic Curve (ICC) interpretations. Samata Health Study participants (n=971)

Items and Response Categories Responses (%) Item and Step Fit
ICC
Rangec
Weighted mean
squarea
Tb
1. contraception 1.2 2.0
2: not using contraception 90.5 1.2 1.8
1: using sometimes or failed at
least once
7.0 1.0 0.3
0: always using contraception 2.5 1.2 1.0
2. timing 0.9 −2.5
2: wanted pregnancy then or
sooner
42.8 1.0 −1.5
1: wanted pregnancy later 41.8 1.0 −0.5
0: did not want pregnancy at all 15.4 0.9 −1.7
3. intention 0.8 −4.3
2: intended pregnancy 61.4 0.8 −4.6
1: intentions kept changing 9.0 1.0 0
0: did not intend pregnancy 29.6 0.9 −3.0
4. want 0.8 −4.3
2: wanted baby 69.5 0.8 −4.2
1: mixed feelings about having
baby
6.4 1.0 0
0: did not want baby 24.1 0.8 −3.6
5. discuss 1.0 0.7
2: agreed to get pregnant 65.9 0.9 −2.1
1: discussed but not agreed to get
pregnant
11.0 1.0 −0.3
0: never discussed getting
pregnant
23.1 1.2 3.2b
6. prepare 1.3 7.8b
2: did 2 or more preparatory
behaviors
40.7 1.2 5.6b
1: did 1 preparatory behavior 21.3 1.0 0b
0: did no preparatory behaviors 37.9 1.3 7.6b

Notes:

a

All items and step fits were within the acceptable weighted mean square statistic range: 0.75-1.33.

b

Lower than expected item or step fit (t>2.0) based on the t-test for the infit statistic

c

√ indicates that the response category is not the most common selection at any range of the LMUP scale.