Table 1.
Contrast | Positiona | F(1,27) | p-Value |
---|---|---|---|
EFFECT OF ATTENTIONAL LOAD IN THE AMYGDALA | |||
Attend-faces > ignore-faces | Central | 44.6 | 0.001 |
Mid | 126.3 | 0.001 | |
Peripheral | 63.1 | 0.001 | |
Positiona | F(1,13) | p-Value | |
Match emotion > match digits low | Central | 93.23 | 0.001 |
Mid | 89.82 | 0.001 | |
Peripheral | 28.62 | 0.001 | |
Match emotion > match digits high | Central | 93.23 | 0.001 |
Mid | 50.97 | 0.001 | |
Peripheral | 24.80 | 0.001 | |
Match gender > match digits low | Central | 27.78 | 0.001 |
Mid | 76.28 | 0.001 | |
Peripheral | 38.19 | 0.001 | |
Match gender > match digits high | Central | 7.52 | 0.017 |
Mid | 31.58 | 0.001 | |
Peripheral | 22.64 | 0.001 | |
Match emotion > match gender | Central | 4.87 | 0.046 |
EFFECT OF STIMULUS ECCENTRICITY IN THE AMYGDALA | |||
Match digits low > fixation | Central > mid | 7.81 | 0.015 |
Match emotion > fixation | Central > mid | 4.97 | 0.044 |
Only statistically significant comparisons are listed in the table.
aPosition of the face stimuli in the visual field.