Skip to main content
. 2010 Aug 18;64(11):1272–1279. doi: 10.1038/ejcn.2010.152

Table 4. Associations (ORs and 95% CIs) between tertiles of pattern scores and overweight among 924 Norwegian 9- to 10-year-old children.

Eating pattern Total n=924 Overweight and obese children Model 1 Model 2
    n % OR crude (95% CI)a OR adjusted (95% CI)b
Snacking
 Tertile 1 308 61 20 1 1
 Tertile 2 307 58 19 1.1 (0.7, 1.6) 1.0 (0.7, 1.6)
 Tertile 3 309 69 22 1.3 (0.8, 1.9) 1.0 (0.7, 1.6)
           
Junk/convenient
 Tertile 1 307 83 27 1 1
 Tertile 2 308 46 15 0.5 (0.3, 0.7) 0.4 (0.3, 0.7)
 Tertile 3 309 59 19 0.6 (0.4, 0.9) 0.6 (0.4, 0.9)
           
Varied Norwegian
 Tertile 1 307 46 15 1 1
 Tertile 2 309 73 24 2.0 (1.3, 3.0) 2.3 (1.5, 3.6)
 Tertile 3 308 69 22 1.7 (1.1, 2.6) 2.1 (1.3, 3.2)
           
Dieting
 Tertile 1 307 39 13 1 1
 Tertile 2 308 68 22 2.1 (1.3, 3.2) 1.9 (1.2, 3.0)
 Tertile 3 309 81 26 2.6 (1.7, 4.0) 2.2 (1.4, 3.4)

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio.

a

Adjusted for the other eating patterns.

b

Adjusted for the other eating patterns, parental BMI, maternal education and physical activity level of the child.