Skip to main content
. 2010 Nov 30;10:740. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-740

Table 3.

Multivariate linear regression analysis of the association between serum total cholesterol levels and ethnicity (B, 95%CI)

Dutch Turkish Moroccan R2

Men (n = 172) (n = 164) (n = 162)

Crude ref -0.47 (-0.69 - -0.25)*** -0.56 (-0.78 - -0.34)*** 0.06
Model 1: adjusted for demographic factors
 age ref -0.45 (-0.66 - -0.23)*** -0.61 (-0.82 - -0.39)*** 0.10
 age, socioeconomic status ref -0.45 (-0.70 - -0.20)*** -0.61 (-0.86 - -0.36)*** 0.11
Model 2: adjusted for demographic (age, SES) and endogenous factors
 Body Mass Index ref -0.59 (-0.84 - -0.35)*** -0.65 (-0.89 - -0.40)*** 0.15
 Body Mass Index, diabetes ref -0.61 (-0.86 - -0.36)*** -0.63 (-0.89 - -0.38)*** 0.16
Model 3: adjusted for demographic (age, SES), endogenous (BMI, diabetes) and lifestyle factors
 smoking ref -0.60 (-0.87 - -0.34)*** -0.60 (-0.87 - -0.34)*** 0.16
 smoking, alcohol abstinence ref -0.53 (-0.85 - -0.21)** -0.50 (-0.85 - -0.15)** 0.15
 smoking, alcohol abstinence, physical activity ref -0.50 (-0.82 - -0.17)** -0.48 (-0.83 - -0.13)** 0.16

Women (n = 243) (n = 193) (n = 134)

Crude ref -0.55 (-0.75 - -0.35)*** -0.60 (-0.83 - -0.38)*** 0.07
Model 1: adjusted for demographic factors
 age ref -0.34 (-0.53 - -0.15)** -0.42 (-0.63 - -0.21)*** 0.22
 age, socioeconomic status ref -0.27 (-0.50 - -0.05)* -0.35 (-0.58 - -0.11)** 0.23
Model 2: adjusted for demographic (age, SES) and endogenous factors
 Body Mass Index ref -0.29 (-0.52 - -0.06)* -0.34 (-0.58 - -0.10)** 0.25
 Body Mass Index, diabetes ref -0.29 (-0.52 - -0.05)* -0.34 (-0.59 - -0.09)** 0.26
Model 3: adjusted for demographic (age, SES), endogenous (BMI, diabetes) and lifestyle factors
 smoking ref -0.18 (-0.43 - 0.07) -0.22 (-0.49 - 0.05) 0.28
 smoking, alcohol abstinence ref -0.06 (-0.39 - 0.27) -0.09 (-0.44 - 0.27) 0.26
 smoking, alcohol abstinence, physical activity ref -0.07 (-0.40 - 0.27) -0.09 (-0.44 - 0.27) 0.26

B, 95% CI, beta-coefficient with 95% confidence interval

R2, R-squared, explained variance of the model

respondents with self-reported lipid lowering medication use excluded

* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 significant difference compared with Dutch ethnic group