Skip to main content
. 2010 Nov 17;107(1):145–155. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcq219

Table 3.

Correlations between leaf longevity and environmental factors and other leaf functional traits for the five steppe species

Species Environmental factors
Other leaf functional traits
SWC SIN STN LNC LPC C/N DMC LMA δ13C NUE SPAD Pnet gs
2007
S. krylovii –0·85**** 0·09 –0·33 –0·89**** –0·57** 0·86*** 0·89**** 0·65** 0·60** 0·75*** –0·69*** –0·90**** –0·78***
A.cristatum –0·86**** –0·02 –0·17 –0·88**** –0·3 0·85**** 0·84**** 0·65** 0·07 0·77*** –0·82**** –0·84**** –0·64**
C. squarrosa –0·57*** 0·13 0·04 –0·89**** –0·28 0·82**** 0·82**** 0·35 0·44* –0·88****
P. tanacetifolia –0·69**** –0·17 –0·23 –0·83**** –0·03 0·74*** 0·75*** 0·75*** 0·27 0·76*** –0·84****
M. ruthenica –0·62*** 0·15 –0·39* –0·88**** 0·14 0·84**** 0·72*** 0·55* 0·52* 0·71*** –0·91****
2008
S. krylovii –0·76**** –0·01 0·03 –0·06 –0·21 0·16 0·44 –0·13 0·43 0·1 –0·46* –0·83**** –0·75***
A. cristatum –0·57*** –0·44** –0·16 –0·82**** 0·07 0·85**** 0·81** 0·78*** –0·1 0·69*** –0·61** –0·48* –0·25
C. squarrosa –0·42* –0·26 0·25 –0·92**** 0·47* 0·88**** 0·86**** 0·83**** –0·18 0·39 –0·48*
P. tanacetifolia –0·64*** –0·42* 0·01 –0·79*** –0·63** 0·83**** 0·82**** 0·67** 0·61* 0·54* –0·84****
M. ruthenica –0·93**** 0·12 0·14 –0·71*** –0·48* 0·66** 0·74*** 0·58** 0·75** 0·45* –0·72***

SWC, soil water content; SIN, soil inorganic nitrogen; STN, soil total nitrogen; LNC, leaf nitrogen content; LPC, leaf phosphorus content; C/N ratio, ratio of leaf carbon to nitrogen contents; DMC, leaf dry matter content; LMA, leaf mass per area; δ13C, leaf carbon isotopic composition; NUE, nitrogen use efficiency; SPAD, estimated leaf chlorophyll concentration; Pnet, net photosynthetic rate based on area; gs, stomatal conductance.

Asterisks indicate statistically significant differences at *P < 0·10, **0·05, ***0·01 and ****0·001.