Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2010 Aug 1;18(3):337–357. doi: 10.1016/j.mric.2010.08.013

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Differences in T1 between water and fat will lead to bias if the image acquisition is T1 weighted. Most MRI methods used to acquire fat-fraction images use gradient echo methods, which T1 weighted using typical flip angles. Since the T1 of fat is shorter than the water signal in the liver, the use of T1 weighted imaging will result in an apparent fat-fraction greater than the true fat-fraction. Reducing the flip angle can minimize T1 bias, although at a cost of reduced SNR performance. It is important to avoid T1 bias – otherwise the apparent fat-fraction will depend on image parameters such as TR and flip angle, and it is difficult to compare results using different protocols or different scanners. This example of MRI-M demonstrates how reducing the flip angle reduces the T1 bias (true PDFF ≈ 11%), although also degrades SNR performance.