Skip to main content
. 2010 Jun 1;28(2):83–93. doi: 10.1136/aim.2009.001370

Table 2.

Checklist of CONSORT items and the non-pharmacological trials extension to CONSORT (with STandards for Reporting Interventions in Clinical Trials of Acupuncture (STRICTA) extending CONSORT item 5 for acupuncture trials)

Section/topic Item number CONSORT 2010 statement* – checklist item10 Describe Additional items from the non-pharmacological trials extension to CONSORT14 Add
Title and abstract 1a Identification as a randomised trial in the title In the abstract, description of the experimental treatment, comparator, care providers, centres and blinding status
1b Structured summary of trial design, methods, results and conclusions; for specific guidance, see CONSORT for abstracts58,59
Introduction
 Background and objectives 2a Scientific background and explanation of rationale
2b Specific objectives or hypotheses
Methods
 Trial design 3a Description of trial design (eg, parallel, factorial) including allocation ratio
3b Important changes to methods after trial commencement (eg, eligibility criteria), with reasons
 Participants 4a Eligibility criteria for participants When applicable, eligibility criteria for centres and those performing the interventions
4b Settings and locations where the data were collected
 Interventions 5 The interventions for each group with sufficient details to allow replication, including how and when they were actually administered Precise details of both the experimental treatment and comparator–see table 1 above for details
 Outcomes 6a Completely defined prespecified primary and secondary outcome measures, including how and when they were assessed
6b Any changes to trial outcomes after the trial started with reasons
 Sample size 7a How sample size was determined When applicable, details of whether and how
7b When applicable, explanation of any interim analyses and stopping guidelines the clustering by care providers or centres was addressed
 Randomisation
  Sequence generation 8a Method used to generate the random allocation sequence When applicable, how care providers were
8b Type of randomisation; details of any restriction (eg, blocking and block size) allocated to each trial group
  Allocation concealment 9 Mechanism used to implement the random allocation sequence (eg, sequentially numbered containers), describing any steps taken to conceal the sequence until interventions were assigned
  Implementation 10 Who generated the random allocation sequence, who enrolled participants, and who assigned participants to interventions
 Blinding 11a If done, who was blinded after assignment to interventions (eg, participants, care providers, those assessing outcomes) and how Whether or not those administering co-interventions were blinded to group assignment
11b If relevant, description of the similarity of interventions If blinded, method of blinding and description of the similarity of interventions
 Statistical methods 12a Statistical methods used to compare groups for primary and secondary outcomes When applicable, details of whether and how the clustering by care providers or centres was addressed
12b Methods for additional analyses, such as subgroup analyses and adjusted analyses
Results
Participant flow (a diagram is strongly recommended) 13a For each group, the numbers of participants who were randomly assigned, received intended treatment and were analysed for the primary outcome The number of care providers or centres performing the intervention in each group and the number of patients treated by each care provider or in each centre
13b For each group, losses and exclusions after randomisation, together with reasons
 Implementation of intervention Details of the experimental treatment and comparator as they were implemented
 Recruitment 14a Dates defining the periods of recruitment and follow-up
14b Why the trial ended or was stopped
 Baseline data 15 A table showing baseline demographic and clinical characteristics for each group When applicable, a description of care providers (case volume, qualification, expertise, etc) and centres (volume) in each group
 Numbers analysed 16 For each group, number of participants (denominator) included in each analysis and whether the analysis was by original assigned groups
 Outcomes and estimation 17a For each primary and secondary outcome, results for each group and the estimated effect size and its precision (eg, 95% CI)
17b For binary outcomes, presentation of both absolute and relative effect sizes is recommended
 Ancillary analyses 18 Results of any other analyses performed, including subgroup analyses and adjusted analyses, distinguishing prespecified from exploratory
 Harms 19 All important harms or unintended effects in each group; for specific guidance see CONSORT for Harms60
Discussion
 Limitations 20 Trial limitations, addressing sources of potential bias, imprecision and, if relevant, multiplicity of analyses
 Generalisability 21 Generalisability (external validity, applicability) of the trial findings Generalisability (external validity) of the trial findings according to the intervention, comparators, patients and care providers and centres involved in the trial
 Interpretation 22 Interpretation consistent with results, balancing benefits and harms, and considering other relevant evidence In addition, take into account the choice of the comparator, lack of or partial blinding, unequal expertise of care providers or centres in each group
Other information
 Registration 23 Registration number and name of trial registry
 Protocol 24 Where the full trial protocol can be accessed, if available
 Funding 25 Sources of funding and other support (eg, supply of drugs); role of funders
*

We strongly recommend reading this statement in conjunction with the CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration11 for important clarifications on all the items. If relevant, we also recommend reading CONSORT extensions for cluster randomised trials,61 non-inferiority and equivalence trials,62 herbal interventions,63 and pragmatic trials.16 Moreover, additional extensions are forthcoming. See http://www.consort-statement.org (accessed April 2010), for those and also for up-to-date references relevant to this checklist.