Skip to main content
. 2010 Nov 29;107(50):21553–21557. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1011081107

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

FAN1/FANCC and FAN1/FANCJ double knockout DT40 cells are more sensitive to cisplatin than single mutants and display more chromosomal aberrations. (A) FAN1−/−/FANCC/− cells are more sensitive to cisplatin than wild-type, FAN1−/−, or FANCC/− single knockout cells. Each data point represents an average of at least three independent experiments ±SD. (B) FAN1−/−/FANCC/− cells display more and different distribution of chromosomal aberrations compared with wild-type, FAN1−/−, or FANCC/− single knockout cells. (C) FAN1−/−/FANCJ−/− cells are more sensitive to cisplatin than wild-type, FAN1−/−, or FANCJ−/− single knockout cells. Each data point represents an average of at least three independent experiments ±SD. (D) Occurrence of chromosomal aberrations in FAN1−/−/FANCCJ−/− cells compared with wild-type, FAN1−/−, or FANCJ−/− single knockout cells. (E) Sister chromatid exchange frequencies in wild type, FAN1−/−, FANCC/−, FANCJ−/−, FAN1−/−/FANCC/−, or FAN1/FANCJ−/− DT40 cells. The y axis shows the number of metaphases containing the number of SCEs indicated on the x axis. At least 50 metaphase spreads were counted for each experiment and the graph shows the mean number of SCEs.