Table 2.
A regression analysis examining F1.
| # | Effect | R2 | R2change | Fchange | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gender | .63 | .63 | F(1,473)=811.5 | <.0001 |
| 2 | Speaker (10) | .82 | .19 | F(8,465)=63.5 | <.0001 |
| 3 | Target Vowel | .83 | .009 | F(1,464)=25.4 | <.0001 |
| 4 | Cons. Voicing | .85 | .018 | F(1,463)=56.5 | <.0001 |
| 5 | Cons. Place (2) | .85 | .003 | F(2,461)=5.1 | .0063 |
| 6 | Voicing × Place (2) | .87 | .01 | F(2,459)=22.8 | <.0001 |
| 7 | Voicing × Vowel | .87 | .00 | F(1,458)<1 | p>.2 |
| 8 | Vowel × Place (2) | .87 | .00 | F(2,456)<1 | p>.2 |
| 9 | Three-Way | .87 | .00 | F(1,455)<1 | p>2 |
| 10 | Context Vowel1 | .88 | .012 | F(3,452)=15.3 | <.0001 |
1
Note residuals from this step were not used in the multinomial logistic regression