Table 2.
Effect of 14 days of subcutaneous continuous infusion of dalteparin alone, epirubicin alone, and a combination of the two drugs on VEGF-mediated angiogenesis and body weight (BW) at sacrifice
Vehicle/D + Vehicle/E2 |
Dalteparin1 + Vehicle/D2 |
Epirubicin1 + Vehicle/E |
Dalteparin + Epirubicin |
|
---|---|---|---|---|
Group C I | Group C II | Group T I | Group T II | |
BW, g | 323.30 ± 6.20 (100) | 322.00 ± 4.76 (100) | 299.60 ± 4.94 (93) | 301.40 ± 5.59 (93) |
VA3 | 14.55 ± 2.36 (100) | 18.47 ± 2.89 (127) | 14.68 ± 2.00 (101) | 13.25 ± 2.20 (91) |
MVL | 1.12 ± 0.08 (100) | 1.15 ± 0.07 (103) | 0.98 ± 0.08 (88) | 0.88 ± 0.06* (79) |
TMVL | 16.28 ± 2.64 (100) | 21.28 ± 3.33 (131) | 14.39 ± 1.96 (88) | 11.64 ± 1.94** (71) |
Values within parenthesis are % of value for CI.
Dalteparin at 80 IU/kg/day; epirubicin at 3.0 mg/kg/week.
Vehicle/D, 0.9% NaCl; Vehicle/E, 0.9% NaCl. Each treatment group comprised 10 animals, with the exception of group T II, which comprised nine animals (one rat was removed due to signs of sickness). There are no statistically significant differences with respect to any variable between groups T I and T II or between groups C I and C II. Data shown are mean ± SEM.
VA, vascularized area, a measure of microvessel spatial extension; MVL, microvascular length, a composite measurement of microvessel density; TMVL, total microvascular length (VA × MVL).
p ≤ 0.02 compared with C II, p ≤ 0.01 compared with [C I + C II];
p ≤ 0.04 compared with C II, p ≤ 0.05 compared with [C I + C II].