Skip to main content
. 2009 Jun 3;37(1):94–100. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbp055

Table 1.

Assays on Subjects From CATIE Trials and Comparison Samples

tTG Antibodies
IgA-Antigliadin Antibodies
CATIE (N = 1401) Comparison, (N = 900) CATIE, (N = 1401) Comparison, (N = 900)
Total positivea (medium plus high) 76 (5.4%) 7 (0.80%) 323 (23.1%) 28 (3.1%)
Low 1325 (94.6%) 893 (99.2%) 1078 (76.9%) 872 (96.9%)
Medium 55 (3.9%)b 7 (0.80%)b 155 (11.1%)c 16 (1.8%)c
High 21 (1.5%)b 0d 168 (12.0%)c 12 (1.3%)c
100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Note: Standard statistical rounding was used across test results. CATIE, Clinical Antipsychotic Trials of Intervention Effectiveness; tTG, antibody to transglutaminase; IgA, immunoglobulin A.

a

The cutoff scores are expressed as arbitrary units established by the manufacturers. INOVA Diagnostics, Inc—cutoff scores for tTG-antibody to gliadin (AGA) and AGA-IgA are each set at the same level: low or negative, <20 units; weak positive, 20–30 units; strong positive >30 units. Scimedx—cutoff scores are negative, <7; positive, >7. INOVA Diagnostics, Inc, kits were employed for CATIE sample tTG tests and all AGA tests. Scimedx kits were employed for comparison tTG tests.

b

χ2 = 392.0, df = 2, P < .001.

c

χ2 = 1884.6, df = 2, P < .001.

d

The manufacturer does not distinguish medium from high; therefore, subjects above the threshold for “low” were placed in the medium category to be conservative.