Skip to main content
. 2010 Dec 14;4:184. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2010.00184

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Precommitment depends on task parameters. (A) Precommitment was greater when the reward ratio RL/RS was larger. On the x axis, DS and RS were simultaneously manipulated so that the SS vs. LL preference was held constant. Despite the constant SS vs. LL preference, the preference for precommitment increased as the size of the small reward decreased. (B) Precommitment increases with the delay (DC) between commitment and choice. At the selected parameters, LL was preferred 0.196 as much as SS. When there was no delay between commitment and choice, C was preferred over N by the same ratio. As DC increased, the relative preference for N increased, despite no change in the relative preference for SS vs. LL. This figure was generated with mathematical hyperbolic discounting.