Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Magn Reson Med. 2011 Jan;65(1):269–279. doi: 10.1002/mrm.22591

Table 3.

Results of the fBIRN EPI stability measurements (in mean ± SD across runs). The only major difference between the runs with vs. without PET insert can be seen in the signal intensity drift. SFNR and rdc show a statistical significant difference between the two configurations, however, these values are still in a range where they are unlikely to impact in-vivo imaging studies. Average signal intensity and RMS stability are not influenced by the presence of the PET insert.

number of runs without PET with PET statistical significance
n = 9 n = 30
Average signal intensity [a.u.] 2342 ± 6 2331 ± 89 No (p > 0.05)
Signal intensity drift [%] 0.062 ± 0.032 0.617 ± 0.346 Yes (p < 0.05)
RMS stability [%] 0.071 ± 0.004 0.070 ± 0.006 No (p > 0.05)
SFNR 333 ± 11 311 ± 18 Yes (p < 0.05)
rdc [Pixel] 4.01 ± 0.23 4.62 ± 0.42 Yes (p < 0.05)