Table 2.
Factor | Element | Physical audit score | Virtual audit score | ICC | F | p value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Walking | ||||||
Function | Walking surface | 1.20 | 1.24 | 0.95a | 2.97 | 0.18 |
Neighborhood permeability | 0.61 | 0.62 | 0.60 | 1.00 | 0.39 | |
Walking infrastructure | 0.16 | 0.14 | 0.94a | 8.00 | 0.07 | |
Safety | Streets (lanes) | 0.22 | 0.22 | 1.00b | – | – |
Fixed traffic controls | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.21 | 0.35 | 0.60 | |
Path safety | 0.45 | 0.42 | 0.94a | 2.03 | 0.25 | |
Traffic safety | 0.12 | 0.08 | 0.84a | 1.49 | 0.31 | |
Aesthetics | Streetscape aesthetics | 0.60 | 0.59 | 0.99a | 6.00 | 0.09 |
View aesthetics | 0.66 | 0.66 | 1.00b | – | – | |
Subjective walking assessment | 0.23 | 0.25 | 0.95a | 6.82 | 0.08 | |
Destinations | Land use mix | 2.46 | 2.68 | 0.62 | 0.52 | 0.53 |
Cycling | ||||||
Function | Cycling surface | 0.84 | 0.85 | 1.00b | 25.00 | 0.02 |
Neighborhood permeability | 0.61 | 0.62 | 0.60 | 1.00 | 0.39 | |
Cycling infrastructure | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.00b | – | – | |
Safety | Streets (lanes) | 0.44 | 0.44 | 1.00a | – | – |
Fixed traffic controls | 0.10 | 0.04 | 0.76a | 5.54 | 0.10 | |
Traffic safety | 0.06 | 0.04 | 0.77a | 1.41 | 0.32 | |
Aesthetics | Streetscape aesthetics | 0.30 | 0.29 | 0.92a | 1.42 | 0.32 |
View aesthetics | 0.33 | 0.33 | 1.00b | – | – | |
Subjective cycling assessment | 0.23 | 0.25 | 0.92a | 5.40 | 0.10 | |
Destinations | Land use mix | 2.46 | 2.68 | 0.62 | 0.52 | 0.53 |
F analysis of variance, ICC intraclass correlation coefficient
aAcceptable agreement
bPerfect agreement