. 2010 Nov 23;87(6):1007–1016. doi: 10.1007/s11524-010-9505-x

Table 2.

Test–retest reliability levels of agreement between the physical and virtual audits for walking and cycling

Factor	Element	Physical audit score	Virtual audit score	ICC	F	p value
Walking
Function	Walking surface	1.20	1.24	0.95^a	2.97	0.18
	Neighborhood permeability	0.61	0.62	0.60	1.00	0.39
	Walking infrastructure	0.16	0.14	0.94^a	8.00	0.07
Safety	Streets (lanes)	0.22	0.22	1.00^b	–	–
	Fixed traffic controls	0.05	0.04	0.21	0.35	0.60
	Path safety	0.45	0.42	0.94^a	2.03	0.25
	Traffic safety	0.12	0.08	0.84^a	1.49	0.31
Aesthetics	Streetscape aesthetics	0.60	0.59	0.99^a	6.00	0.09
	View aesthetics	0.66	0.66	1.00^b	–	–
	Subjective walking assessment	0.23	0.25	0.95^a	6.82	0.08
Destinations	Land use mix	2.46	2.68	0.62	0.52	0.53
Cycling
Function	Cycling surface	0.84	0.85	1.00^b	25.00	0.02
	Neighborhood permeability	0.61	0.62	0.60	1.00	0.39
	Cycling infrastructure	0.00	0.00	1.00^b	–	–
Safety	Streets (lanes)	0.44	0.44	1.00^a	–	–
	Fixed traffic controls	0.10	0.04	0.76^a	5.54	0.10
	Traffic safety	0.06	0.04	0.77^a	1.41	0.32
Aesthetics	Streetscape aesthetics	0.30	0.29	0.92^a	1.42	0.32
	View aesthetics	0.33	0.33	1.00^b	–	–
	Subjective cycling assessment	0.23	0.25	0.92^a	5.40	0.10
Destinations	Land use mix	2.46	2.68	0.62	0.52	0.53

F analysis of variance, ICC intraclass correlation coefficient

^aAcceptable agreement

^bPerfect agreement