Skip to main content
. 2009 Dec 18;2(6):398–404. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-8062.2009.00161.x

Table 1.

Quantitation of connective tissue mineralization of vibrissae*.

Mouse Diet Diet started → diet end (months) No. of mice Mineralized vibrissae (per mouse) Total vibrissae examined (per mouse) Percent mineralized Area of mineralization per total area of vibrissae (%) Fold p‐value
Wild‐type Control 1 → 6 9 0 11.0 0 0
Abcc6−/− Control 1 → 3 8 5.5 10.3 58.1 ± 5.5 0.69 ± 0.14 1.0 0.001§
Abcc6−/− Control 1 → 6 9 6.4 8.8 75.2 ± 5.2 2.78 ± 0.76 4.0 0.001§
Abcc6−/− Magnesium carbonate 1 → 3 6 0 7.7 0 0 0 0.001
Abcc6−/− Magnesium carbonate 1 → 6 5 0.2 6.8 4.0 ± 4.0 0.15 ± 0.15 0.2 0.003
Abcc6−/− Magnesium carbonate 3 → 6 8 4.6 8.4 49.3 ± 12.4 0.97 ± 0.33 1.4 0.074∥,¶
Abcc6−/− Lanthanum carbonate 1 → 3 6 2.5 13.2 23.3 ± 15.9 0.72 ± 0.39 1.0 0.555
Abcc6−/− Lanthanum carbonate 1 → 6 5 5.6 6.0 92.5 ± 5.0 1.92 ± 0.28 2.8 0.884
Abcc6−/− Lanthanum carbonate 3 → 6 5 5.0 8.5 60.0 ± 5.7 2.32 ± 0.49 3.4 0.897

* Skin sections containing vibrissae were stained with H&E and examined by computerized morphometric analysis.

Values presented as mean ± S.E.

Calculated using the 3‐month‐old Abcc6 −/− mice as 1.0.

§ Compared with the wild type mice.

Compared with age‐matched Abcc6 −/− mice on control diet.

Statistical difference by Student's t‐test, p= 0.0497.