Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Dev Psychopathol. 2010 May;22(2):313–335. doi: 10.1017/S0954579410000088

Table 6.

Odds Ratios for Grade 5 Outcomes by Locality-Race Group

Grade 5 Outcome Latent Class
Two- Parent Low Risk Single Parent/History of Problems Single- Parent Multilevel Risk Two-Parent Multilevel Risk
CBCL Externalizing Problems (N=644; p<.001)
 Urban African American ref 0.1 4.8 3.0
 Urban White ref 1.4 0.2 2.9
 Rural White ref 0.3 >100 6.2

TRF Externalizing Problems (N=622; p<.001)
 Urban African American ref 2.1 6.3 2.8
 Urban White ref 1.6 76.2 2.7
 Rural White ref 0.2 >100 6.7

Failing Grades (N=639; p<.001)
 Urban African American ref 3.6 8.5 5.9
 Urban White ref 1.8 2.5 2.5
 Rural White ref 2.3 0.1 5.0

Low Academic Achievement (N=630; p<.001)
 Urban African American ref 44.7 >100 >100
 Urban White ref 0.4 3.3 2.3
 Rural White ref 0.9 >100 10.3

Notes: For each row, ref indicates the reference class in the logistic regression model; p-values represent overall relation between risk profile membership and Grade 5 outcome based on log-likelihood difference test; for the white groups, odds ratios corresponding to membership in the Single-Parent Multilevel Risk latent class are based on a very small expected number of children.