Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Dec 21.
Published in final edited form as: J Cogn Neurosci. 2009 Oct;21(10):1980–1987. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2008.21143

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Schematic of one iteration of the experimental design of Experiment 1 showing the timing of verbal fluency (VF) and remote associates test (RAT) in relation to the stimulation sessions. Three equally difficult versions of the RAT were used. Versions of VF (e.g., A–S or C–L) and the RAT (e.g., Problem Set 1 or Problem Set 2) were counterbalanced across stimulation conditions. The order of stimulation sessions was counterbalanced across subjects. In Experiment 2, both VF and RAT were administered as posttests, and order of completion was counterbalanced.