Skip to main content
. 2010 Nov;19(11):2073–2084. doi: 10.1002/pro.487

Table III.

Comparison of Kinetic Parameters of CpmtFNR/CpmtFd Toward NADPH with Those from Other Apicomplexans, Humans, and Representative Plants

Speciesa Type kcat (s−1) KmM) kcat/Km (s−1 μM−1) pH e Acceptor References
CpmtFNR Mito 21.71 24.16 0.90 6.8 cyt c This study
CpmtFNR Mito 0.24 3.66 0.064 7.4 cyt c This study
CpmtFNR Mito 0.60 9.42 0.064 8.2 cyt c This study
PfFNR Plant 13.0 5.5 2.4 7.0 cyt c 11
PfFNR Plant 23 61 0.37 8.2 cyt c 11
TgFNR Plant 115 1.9 61 8.2 cyt c 16
SoFNR Plant 180 5 36 8.2 cyt c 16
ZmFNR Plant 227 7 32 8.2 cyt c 16
HsFNR Mito 11.8 0.8 14.75 7.2 cyt c 35
a

Species initials: Cp, Cryptosporidium parvum; Pf, Plasmodium falciparum; Tg, Toxoplasma gondii; So, Spinacia oleracea; Zm: Zea Mays (root-type FNR); Hs, homo sapiens.