Skip to main content
. 2010 Oct 18;20(2):378–386. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddq461

Table 2.

Case–control comparison of mean RTL on homologous short version of chromosome arms

Chromosome arms All subjects
Pre-menopausal women
Post-menopausal women
Cases, n = 204 Controls, n = 236 P-value Cases, n = 89 Controls n = 96 P-value Cases, n = 110 Controls, n = 132 P-value
1p 0.75 (0.13) 0.78 (0.15) 0.04 0.74 (0.12) 0.81 (0.15) 0.003 0.75 (0.14) 0.76 (0.15) 0.65
Xp 0.78 (0.16) 0.80 (0.15) 0.29 0.76 (0.15) 0.83 (0.15) 0.001 0.78 (0.17) 0.78 (0.15) 0.31
9p 0.66 (0.14) 0.69 (0.13) 0.05 0.67 (0.14) 0.72 (0.13) 0.007 0.66 (0.14) 0.67 (0.13) 0.70
15p 0.70 (0.15) 0.70 (0.14) 0.64 0.68 (0.15) 0.74 (0.15) 0.013 0.71 (0.15) 0.66 (0.13) 0.01

RTL was defined as the percent of arm-specific telomere length divided by total telomere length of 92 telomeres. Mean (SD)s were presented in the table. P-values were considered significant if P ≤ 0.0005 (Bonferroni's correction 0.05/(46 × 2) = 0.0005).

P-values were based on Wilcoxon's rank-sum test.