Skip to main content
. 2010 Dec 2;11(Suppl 4):S22. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-11-S4-S22

Table 2.

Model comparison on gp120_Benchmark_1 dataset

Models MSERP MSESP MSELTNP MSEOverall CCI STD TBM
SV-HMM 38.02 30.46 45.57 30.21 67.82 0.8 2.62
HMESVM 36.35 24.13 44.43 29.76 69.38 1.9 1.35
SVMLIB 54.53 20.68 44.43 32.65 67.39 1.1 0.17
DecorateSVM 81.82 10.34 55.55 32.88 65.31 2.7 3.02
MLP 72.43 27.59 55.57 27.27 57.14 4.2 4.14
RBFN 63.63 27.58 77.78 29.32 55.10 3.8 0.06
Logistic 63.63 34.48 66.66 31.35 53.06 1.0 0.11
J48 90.91 37.93 66.67 37.77 44.90 3.0 0.01

The final CCI value was calculated based on the average of all the prediction accuracies ob-served during the tenfold validation process. MSE, TBM and STD (ST Deviation obtained from ten sub-samples) indicate the accuracy, complexity and stability of the model respectively.