Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Addiction. 2010 Sep 30;106(1):170–177. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2010.03112.x

Table 3.

Logistic regression odds ratios (and 95 % confidence intervals) for risk of being current smoker (vs. non-smoker) and ever smoker (vs. never smoker) among evening types. Panel analysis of smoking status by diurnal type for 1975, 1981 and 1990 survey data. Reference group is morning type. Table shows analyses when risks were adjusted for age, sex, life satisfaction, heavy drinking.

Current
Ever
Adjusted All Men Women All Men Women
Age and sex 2.91 (2.50, 3.38) 2.73 (2.22, 3.36) 3.37 (2.71, 4.19) 2.67 (2.27, 3.14) 2.69 (2.12, 3.4) 3.22 (2.58, 4.02)
Age, sex and life satisfaction 2.72 (2.34, 3.15) 2.52 (2.04, 3.10) 3.18 (2.56, 3.96) 2.59 (2.21, 3.04) 2.55 (2.01, 3.25) 3.13 (2.50, 3.90)
Age, sex and heavy drinking 2.64 (2.27, 3.06) 2.54 (2.07, 3.13) 2.95 (2.37, 3.67) 2.46 (2.09, 2.90) 2.50 (1.95, 3.20) 2.89 (2.32, 3.62)
Age, sex, life satisfaction and heavy drinking 2.50 (2.15, 2.90) 2.38 (1.94, 2.93) 2.82 (2.26, 3.51) 2.41 (2.05, 2.84) 2.44 (1.90, 3.12) 2.81 (2.25, 3.52)