Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Health Policy. 2010 Aug 4;99(1):52–59. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2010.07.008

Table 3.

The Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio and Sensitivity Analysis

Variable Range $/LYa
Base-case 95,625
Interval of time between screening and diagnosis t=3-months 194,644
t=9-months 62,657
Number of program participants n=189 (25% less) 127,118
n=315 (25% more) 76,728
Age of women and PPV varied simultaneously Age=40-49/ PPV=0.04 95,346
Age=50-54/ PPV=0.09 47,889
Age=55-59/ PPV=0.09 83,323
Age=60-69/ PPV=0.17 65,376
Age=70+/ PPV=0.19 89,361
Percent change in number of women who receive
cancer diagnosis and treatment
p=15% increase 36,052
The methodological factor of accounting for total
medical costs
LC=total medical costs 85,815b
a

2006 dollars, costs and effects are discounted by 3%, and LY stands for life-years.

b

undiscounted