Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2010 Sep 24;97(3):406–415. doi: 10.1016/j.pbb.2010.09.013

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Maze comparison after restraint stress: 60 min restraint decreased both percent time spent in open areas (A) and number of head dips (B) compared to controls regardless of maze. Start latency (C) increased after restraint stress compared to controls in both mazes. Animals under restraint stress decreased the number of closed area entries (D) made compared to controls. In the Plus, restraint stress decreased the percentage of time animals spent in the center region of the maze (E). Distance traveled (F) in the open-field was not altered from restraint stress. ***p ≤ 0.001. Restraint stress: N = 10/maze; Control: Zero N= 21; Plus N = 22.