Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Jan 21.
Published in final edited form as: J Theor Biol. 2010 Oct 16;269(1):1–15. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2010.10.001

Table 6.

Comparison of the estimated values of M-H and MI-based dissimilarities under BPLN and non-parametric (NP) models for CD8+ data. The confidence intervals are obtained via the bias-corrected, non-parametric bootstrap method. The corresponding bootstrap distributions of the dissimilarity measures are presented in panels (A) and (B) of Figure 7.

M-H Dis. MI Dis.
BPLN 0.974 (0.937, 0.994) 0.977 (0.966, 0.998)
NP 0.945 (0.913, 0.972) 0.596 (0.583, 0.666)