Table 1.

Pattern of expression of the sequences affected by cold stress and heat shock

Pattern of expression		During thermal stress (T = 0 h)			After recovery (T = 3 h)
		SignificantaN = 2,987	Significantly affected ≥twofold	High certaintyb	SignificantaN = 2,632	Significantly affected ≥twofold	High certaintyb
Affected only by cold	Total	2,357	381	323	1,310	162	98
	Increased	1,222	138	114	748	73	51
	Decreased	1,135	243	209	562	89	47
Affected only by heat	Total	389	52	24	975	195	128
	Increased	144	30	14	362	126	87
	Decreased	245	22	10	613	69	41
Similarly affected by cold and heat	Total	160	12		296	13
	Increased	21	2		50	8
	Decreased	139	10		246	5
Oppositely affected by cold and heatc	Total	81	3	3	51	0	0
	Cold up–heat down	54	0	0	48	0	0
	Cold down–heat up	27	3	3	3	0	0
Cold totals	Significantly different from controls	2,598	409d		1657	192d
	Increased	1,297	143d		846	83d
	Decreased	1,301	266d		811	109d
Heat totals	Significantly different from controls	630	71d		1322	231d
	Increased	192	35d		415	146d
	Decreased	438	36d		907	85d

^aImplies that a significant difference was found both by two-way and one-way ANOVA and that post-hoc comparisons showed a significant difference between control and one or both of the thermal stress conditions

^bImplies that there was also a significant difference between responses to heat and cold in the post-hoc comparisons

^cAll of these showed, in the post-hoc analysis, a significant difference between control conditions and each of the thermal conditions tested, as well as a significant difference between heat and cold

^dComputed without regard to the magnitude of the effect of the opposite thermal stimulus and therefore can add up to more than the sum of the previous categories