Skip to main content
. 2010 Dec 21;16(47):5982–5992. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i47.5982

Table 1.

Study characteristics

Author Country Publication type n Length of follow-up (mo)
Combination therapy vs sclerotherapy
Westaby et al[36] United Kingdom Article 53 6
Jensen et al[37] Denmark Article 31 12
Bertoni et al[38] Italy Letter 28 2
Gerunda et al[39] Italy Abstract 60 6
Lundell et al[40] Sweden Article 41 8
Kanazawa et al[32] Japan Abstract 43 27
Vinel et al[41] France Article 74 3
Acharya et al[42] India Article 114 24
Avgerinos et al[43] Greece Article 85 23.9
Villanueva et al[33] Spain Article 40 26
Vickers et al[44] United Kingdom Article 73 24
Elsayed et al[34] Egypt Article 178 21
Benedeto-Stojanov et al[45] Yugoslavia Abstract 65 39
Dowidar et al[35] Egypt Article 40 16.2
Combination therapy vs banding ligation
Abdel-Rahim et al[46] Egypt Abstract 50 < 3
Lo et al[12] China Article 122 12
de la Peña et al[13] Spain Article 84 16